Conferences Series Events
SPACE   |   EVOLUTION   |   PHYSICS   |   SOCIAL SCIENCES   |   NATURAL SCIENCES   |   DNA   |   PSYCHOLOGY   |   BIOTECH   |   MEDICINE   |   ANTHROPOLOGY   |   ASTRONOMY
INTERNET   |   NEW MEDIA   |   START-UPS   |   PERSONAL TECHNOLOGY   |   WIRELESS   |   COMPUTING   |   ENGINEERING   |   CEOS
RELIGION   |   GAMING   |   FILM   |   FASHION   |   SEX   |   PHILOSOPHY   |   EDUCATION   |   HISTORY   |   ARTS   |   MUSIC   |   TRAVEL   |   PHOTOGRAPHY
Watch Now

Debate: The World Would Be Better Off Without Religion

More from this partner:

19
Likes
0
Dislikes
RATE
40,754 Views

  • Info
  • Bio
  • Chapters
  • Highlights
  • Transcript
  • Download
  • More
Please or register to post a comment.

mikeytwice Avatar
mikeytwice
Posts: 1
Posted: 02.08.12, 04:22 PM
A.C. Grayling opened by saying that religion tells us what we can wear, how many wives we can have etc... However, then his argument is also that the world would be better off without laws. Or am I wrong by making this statement?
bdoolan Avatar
bdoolan +
Posts: 4
Posted: 01.30.12, 06:28 AM
Dear oh Dear where is Christopher Hitchens when we need him? He would have destroyed these two half-wits.
Güler Avatar
Güler
Posts: 1
Posted: 01.01.12, 09:06 AM
Why are we still arguing whether religion is good or bad? Religion will be vanished from the earth quicker than we may guess. I just feel sorry for the people who have to defend science, humanity, progress against those charlatans...
arscynic Avatar
arscynic
Posts: 1
Posted: 12.13.11, 10:09 AM
This Characterisation of Sam Harris seems erroneous, as he did drop out of college only to then get a B.A.from Stanford in Philosophy, followed by a Ph.D. from UCLA in Neuroscience.

Just thought I would share.

I was undecided and moved in the direction A.C. Grayling and Matthew Chapman (the guys with a British accent).
Dallas1 Avatar
Dallas1
Posts: 12
Posted: 12.02.11, 06:03 PM
It's interesting that the elements of morality, decency, egalitarianism are in fact "shadows of God", at least the essence, the intent, of the Judeo-Christian scriptures.

Every person raised in the West, including those who have had no experience of organized religion and have or would never study it seriously, has a psyche very deeply infused with the philosophies of the Judeo-Christian tradition.

For this reason, to imagine that the deep influence of religion can be cast off or separated from the psyche is somewhat of a magical argument in the first place.

If all organized religion were to be banned, including removing the "shadows of God" from our collective psyche, over time its influence would surely wane, but I dread to imagine what kind of society might evolve out of pure secularism. If you might notice that the educational choices we have for our children is confusing at this point, I shudder to think of the chaos that would result at the other end of that process.

Then again, the end of such an imaginary evolution in thought might well resemble organized religion anyway, and things would come full-circle. We are hard-wired for some kind of experience of transcendence, no getting around it.
swchansen Avatar
swchansen
Posts: 1
Posted: 11.30.11, 11:48 AM
I have to agree with those who are surprising by the outcome of the vote. On the basis of only the quality of argumentation, Wolpe and D'Souza seems to me to have a clear upper hand.

I know that the measure of success in the debate was the raw increase in percentages for or against the measure. However, it's interesting to note that position Against the measure (Wolpe/D'Souza) experienced a larger relative increase (19%) than the position For the measure (13%).
Costaire Avatar
Costaire
Posts: 4
Posted: 11.29.11, 11:24 AM
Considering the overwhelming proliferation of ignorance in the world and the scientific illiteracy of America in particular, I think the world is probably better off with religion. At least with it, forgiving for a moment that none of the truth claims of religion are in anyway verifiable or necessarily ethical or in fact valid, religion does emotionally console the ignorant and stop the few people who would otherwise regress to criminality because of a belief in a deity as a constant measure of surveillance. In every way religion is the best superficial means of government and the best self serving method of solipsistic narcissism we have available. To quote from Karl Marx; "religion is the opium of the people." Furthermore in America and other fundamentally insane regions of the world; religion is an intoxicating narcotic addition used to escape reality and intentionally sold to the masses for its socio-economic and political value.

For those countries and states without readily available source of prescription medication and a well funded legal system; religion is the cheapest alternative there is to reality and a decent education. Until the world becomes serious about educating its children and not inculcating them with preconceived dogmatic ideologies infused most people don't have the opportunity to break free from the religious laundry imposed on them. By the time most children have grown up they are surrounded by a culture who demean free thought and inquiry and encourage credulity. Coupled with the human desire for self preservation and energy conservation, most people will have no intention of actually pursuing reality on an honest objective level. Faith thus far being the furthest thing from honest inquiry and raised up from a time when evidence to the contrary was unavailable and fantasy on the other hand was standard practice.

Religion was used to keep the uneducated and credulous masses in check then, and it will continue to be used to influence, direct and control the masses in the future. The argument proves itself every time we have an election.

- Costaire
tom merle Avatar
tom merle +
Posts: 3
Posted: 11.27.11, 08:38 PM
With the numbers so close wasn't it really a draw...?
jamccallister Avatar
jamccallister
Posts: 1
Posted: 11.25.11, 03:36 PM
I was also very surprised at the results of the debate. It think it would be fairer if the undecided category were removed. I imagine many people would be "undecided" but leaning toward for or "undecided" yet bias toward against.
code933k Avatar
code933k
Posts: 5
Posted: 11.23.11, 07:42 PM
D'Souza is an insult to any rational person. What a twisted logic and misuse of facts...
Advertisement
NO ADS + DOWNLOADS + HQ VIEWING
UPGRADE TO FORA.tv PLUS
Advertisement