Conferences Series Events
SPACE   |   EVOLUTION   |   PHYSICS   |   SOCIAL SCIENCES   |   NATURAL SCIENCES   |   DNA   |   PSYCHOLOGY   |   BIOTECH   |   MEDICINE   |   ANTHROPOLOGY   |   ASTRONOMY
INTERNET   |   NEW MEDIA   |   START-UPS   |   PERSONAL TECHNOLOGY   |   WIRELESS   |   COMPUTING   |   ENGINEERING   |   CEOS
RELIGION   |   GAMING   |   FILM   |   FASHION   |   SEX   |   PHILOSOPHY   |   EDUCATION   |   HISTORY   |   ARTS   |   MUSIC   |   TRAVEL   |   PHOTOGRAPHY
Watch Now

Elevation Partners Director and Co-Founder Roger McNamee

More from this partner:

18
Likes
3
Dislikes
RATE
82,978 Views

  • Info
  • Bio
  • Chapters
  • Highlights
  • Transcript
  • Download
  • More
Please or register to post a comment.

Vishalchohan Avatar
Vishalchohan
Posts: 23
Posted: 02.18.12, 06:27 AM
I totally agree with TiedTiger
Floppy to usb
Vishalchohan Avatar
Vishalchohan
Posts: 23
Posted: 02.18.12, 06:26 AM
I agree with tiedtiger
<a href="http://www.floppytousb.net/">Floppy Disc</a>
melliott Avatar
melliott
Posts: 2
Posted: 08.01.11, 12:27 PM
Music is no longer has scalability without attached proprietary hardware. Anesthesiology has never been. Musicians will have to just make a living like other professionals.
ME
www.memarkelliottme.com
tiedtiger Avatar
tiedtiger
Posts: 1
Posted: 07.27.11, 06:15 PM
Follow me here if you will:

1. Apple did not say 'the web is dangerous'. They promoted web development as a part of iPhone from day 1, invented WebKit, Safari and all sorts.

2. Smartphones only use 1% search? Smartphones such as the GOOGLE Android platform perhaps? And it's 12%.

But really what this is about is this: Lots of content creators are afraid of the un-packaged world, the world where there is no publishing layer to shield and protect them, where they really have to go ahead and do great work. The app store is not the saviour of that any more than iTunes was. And nor, while we're on the subject, is the 100% indexable (that means searchable) HTML5 (which by the way is slower than lighter apps, but that's an aside).

In short, you are reading too much hot air and hoping that it somehow pivots us back toward the broadcast age when only a few music acts were hyper-successful and everyone else was screwed by record labels, and you are doing so because it somehow offends you that Google made a way for the world to come to your door. And all they asked in return was the right to show some relevant advertising alongside those searches (not the work, the searches) as a way to make their business work.

Which, since we're on the subject, is no different than all the ads appearing beside articles for your work in NME. I don't see you wandering around demanding NME for some of the ad revenue from Kasabian's new album campaign just because it appeared beside a feature for your band.

Search is the best thing to happen since the printing press was invented for writers, artists, film-makers, game developers and anyone else that calls themselves creative. That they are too terrified to learn how to use it is entirely their problem.
JSCard Avatar
JSCard
Posts: 1
Posted: 07.27.11, 03:35 PM
Incidentally, I tried watching this on my BlackBerry, but "The video is not available on this device"... so I've had to resort to my good'ole Windows desktop. Looks like the future hasn't arrived just yet.
eddyPham Avatar
eddyPham
Posts: 1
Posted: 07.26.11, 07:14 PM
Is he serious about all he states. What the hell. I agree with RagingBeard, thanks for looking up the impressions percentage. Google is dying, where does he come up with this. He is seriously lining up something with Apple. It is so transparent. Let's keep an eye for his new ventures.
RagingBeard Avatar
RagingBeard
Posts: 1
Posted: 07.25.11, 03:38 PM
This guy is a flat out liar.

I know his companies' portfolio doesn't contain Apple, but it's clear he has a biased for their product and this is nothing more than a FUD campaign to further some agenda they've lined up.

To correct one of his intentional lies -- which he stated was fact, mobile searches 'now' account for 12% of all paid search impressions, not 1%;
http://searchengineland.com/mobile-n...ressions-86121

Now last year, all smart-phones combined only made about about 1% of all internet usage, so the above is an impressive growth.

And when he says Google isn't important on devices like this, he's obviously holding up an iPhone, which ironically uses Google as the default search-engine for mobile Safari.

It's really easy to debunk anything he says, just use Google's search.
OmarKattan Avatar
OmarKattan
Posts: 1
Posted: 07.25.11, 05:30 AM
Brilliant, thank you.
Nuno Lopes Avatar
Nuno Lopes
Posts: 1
Posted: 07.25.11, 04:47 AM
It's seams to me that he is overlooking google Chrome and Apps. Also the recent move of Microsoft to *everything html5*.
Furthermore, apps become multiplataform which may in time turn the iPad less relevant to the show. (http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/04...nect_armchair/).

Apart from that its enlightening to say the least, in particularly the diagnostic that MS is becoming less and less relevant. I agree that we have a blank sheet once again to play on and that the iPad is definitely the device to test it on.
Griffin de Luce Avatar
Griffin de Luce
Posts: 1
Posted: 07.22.11, 10:46 PM
I found the entire hour to be enlightening, but the parts on Google's Index Search issues and Apple's strategy around HTML 5 to be particularly fascinating.
Advertisement
NO ADS + DOWNLOADS + HQ VIEWING
UPGRADE TO FORA.tv PLUS
Advertisement