Science's First Mistake: Delusions In Pursuit of Theory?

QED: Who am I ? ==. Cells make copies of themselves. Different cells make different copies of themselves. Cells come in all shapes and sizes. Somehow these different cells are tied between themselves and during pregnancy process of 9 months gradually ( ! ) and by chance ( or not by chance ) they change own geometrical form from zygote to a child. Cells come in all shapes and sizes, and then . . . they are you. Cells they are you ( !? ) This is modern biomechanical /chemical point of view. # Maybe 99% agree that ‘Cells - they are you .’ But this explanation is not complete. Cells have an energy / electrical potential. Cells have an electromagnetic field. Therefore we need to say: ‘ Cells and electromagnetic field - they are you.’ ===. Is this formulation correct? Of course it is correct. Why? Because: Bioelectromagnetism (sometimes equated with bioelectricity) refers to the electrical, magnetic or electromagnetic fields produced by living cells, tissues or organisms. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bioelectromagnetism What does it mean? It means there isn’t biological cell without electromagnetic fields. It means that in the cell we have two ( 2 ) substances: matter and electromagnetic fields. And in 1985 Richard P. Feynman wrote book: QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter The idea of book - the interaction between light ( electromagnetic fields ) and matter is strange. He wrote: ‘ The theory of quantum electrodynamics describes Nature as absurd from the point of view of common sense. And it agrees fully with experiment. So I hope you accept Nature as She is — absurd. ‘ / page 10. / # Once again: 1. Cells and electromagnetic field - they are you. 2. We cannot understand their interaction and therefore we don’t know the answer to the question: ‘ who am I ?’ ===. Socratus.

The video down link is not working!

Does an Absolute Infinite Frame of Reference exist? Hmm? 1. The detected material mass of the matter in the Universe ( the cosmological constant / the critical density of Uuniverse) is so small (the average density of all substance in the Universe is approximately p=10^-30 g/sm^3 ) that it cannot ‘close’ the Universe into sphere and therefore our Universe as whole must be ‘open’, endless 2. The Universe as whole is Empty. But the Emptiness isn’t emptiness because it is filled with dark matter and dark energy : ‘ 90% or more of the matter in the Universe is unseen / dark.’ 3. Now (!) the physicists think that the Universe as whole the Absolute Frame of Reference of the Universe is: T=2,7K . ( Nobel Prize in Physics 1978 for discovery of cosmic microwave background radiation). (!) It means the Universe as whole has negative parameter, it is negative temperature, it is Kingdom of Coldness. Only Minkowski spacetime continuum has negative parameter. Therefore I say the Minkowski spacetime continuum is model of Vacuum. The parameter T=2,7K is not constant. It is temporal. In the future ( in the Future- ? ?) it will come to T=0K. 4. What is a vacuum ? The empty space between stars ( Galaxies ) Is this space really empty? . . . . . Although we are used to thinking of empty space as containing nothing at all, and therefore having zero energy, the quantum rules say that there is some uncertainty about this. Perhaps each tiny bit of the vacuum actually contains rather a lot of energy. If the vacuum contained enough energy, it could convert this into particles, in line with E-Mc^2. / Book: Stephen Hawking. Pages 147-148. 5. According to QED Electron in interaction with vacuum has infinity parameters ( energy, mass …etc ) Physicists do not understand what to do with infinite sizes, and therefore they have invented "a method of renormalization", The method of renormalization is a method " to sweep the dust under the carpet." / Feynman./ 6. The concept of infinite/ eternal means nothing to a scientists. They do not understand how they could draw any real, concrete conclusions from this characteristic. A notions of "more", "less", "equally, "similar" could not be conformed to a word infinity or eternity. The Infinity / Eternity is something, that has no borders, has no discontinuity; it could not be compared to anything. Considering so, scientists came to conclusion that the infinity /eternity defies to a physical and mathematical definition and cannot be considered in real processes. Therefore they have proclaimed the strict requirement (on a level of censor of the law): « If we want that the theory would be correct, the infinity/eternity should be eliminated ». Thus they direct all their mathematical abilities, all intellectual energy to the elimination of infinity. But effect of infinity comes again and again and then physicists say: that’ Infinity is the cause of the crisis in Physics.’ Another example of physicist’s thinking: ’ If there’s nothing wrong with me then, maybe there’s something wrong with the Universe.’ / One PhD physicist ./ # Does an Absolute Infinite Frame of Reference exist? I say: this unthinkable Absolute Infinite Frame of Reference has two physical parameters. First: T= 0K, Second: E= 0 (the lowest state of cosmic background energy). ===. Hmm? What to do with this Infinite Absolute Emptiness ? # " Remember gentlemen, we have not proven the aether does not exist, we have only proven we do not need it (for mathematical purposes)".. / Einstein's famous University of Leyden lecture of May 5, 1920./ !!?? So ! What to do with this Infinite Absolute Emptiness ? ==========. Best wishes. Israel Sadovnik. Socratus. ========================.. P.S. Infinite, unbounded, endless, never-ending ,unending, perpetual, interminable, eternal, dateless, spaceless, borderless . . . - What do you read, Prince ? - Words, words, words. # It is no matter how you call it. The matter is: How can Infinity be concrete? ===========.

The same thing is said better in Buddhist philosophy - also in gender and race studies. Small points - the word 'data' is plural - e.g. data are filtered Also, use of 'delusion' is a harsh way to describe 'practical frameworks'.