Conferences Series Events
SPACE   |   EVOLUTION   |   PHYSICS   |   SOCIAL SCIENCES   |   NATURAL SCIENCES   |   DNA   |   PSYCHOLOGY   |   BIOTECH   |   MEDICINE   |   ANTHROPOLOGY   |   ASTRONOMY
INTERNET   |   NEW MEDIA   |   START-UPS   |   PERSONAL TECHNOLOGY   |   WIRELESS   |   COMPUTING   |   ENGINEERING   |   CEOS
RELIGION   |   GAMING   |   FILM   |   FASHION   |   SEX   |   PHILOSOPHY   |   EDUCATION   |   HISTORY   |   ARTS   |   MUSIC   |   TRAVEL   |   PHOTOGRAPHY
Watch Now

Robert Sapolsky: Are Humans Just Another Primate?

More from this partner:

59
Likes
3
Dislikes
RATE
55,521 Views

  • Info
  • Bio
  • Chapters
  • Highlights
  • Transcript
  • Download
  • More
Please or register to post a comment.

uriupina Avatar
uriupina
Posts: 2
Posted: 06.21.11, 04:54 AM
Quote:
Why is he so insistent about anthropomorphizing animals by providing them with his made-up internal monologues?
I think this is just about making a lecture more entertaining, even adults are more attentive when the thing they are listening to is at times fun.
Of course, it is not needed when professionals talk between themselves, but a lecture for a wide audience - why not? I don't imagine the listeners will remain convinced that a fish indeed has an internal monologue. If someone will, then such person should be studied by neurologists for his/her inability to recognize jokes.))
mvanderford Avatar
mvanderford
Posts: 17
Posted: 03.15.11, 12:42 PM
Irony.

His 'anthropomorphizing' animals is a metaphor. The ability to understand metaphor is one characteristic that distinguishes human primates from the others.

His point is that chimps and humans share the same fundamental features (hence the anthropomorphizing), but that humans have more extreme versions of the features (hence the metaphor). I guess this is subtle.

He points out that mentioning 'culture' and 'personality' used to be forbidden, but as the evidence collects, there is ample proof of 'culture' and 'personality' in other species.
slgreene3 Avatar
slgreene3
Posts: 1
Posted: 03.08.11, 04:15 PM
Why is he so insistent about anthropomorphizing animals by providing them with his made-up internal monologues? His monologues would be over-the-top even for humans. I thought biologists opposed anthropomorpizing as being unscientific. Don't they constantly condescend to laymen for doing exactly what he's doing?
writ Avatar
writ
Posts: 1
Posted: 03.03.11, 01:37 AM
The last remark regarding how humans would be more motivated to do things that are increasingly improbably seem to contradict what he has gone through earlier with the chimps, dopamine levels, and motivation.
pbredder Avatar
pbredder
Posts: 1
Posted: 03.02.11, 07:36 PM
I'm not sure I understand you. Do you see our use of language as a means of transferring 'memes'? (Reading in of software) That these memes then take a degree of (parasitic) control of our thinking? That our thinking is much a reflection our personal meme archive? If you do, then I agree.

This is a form of cultural evolution -- evolution that takes place at a rate orders of magnitude faster than genetic evolution occurs.

Humans have developed this information transfer process to a much higher degree than other species. It catapults us largely free of evolving gene pools, as a determinant of evolving individual or societal behavior.

Information, in its broadest sense, is a resource for our thinking, and thus catalyzes much of our intentional behavior. We also use language to facilitate information storage and processing (mental modelling), and for informing others (meme transfer?).

Language is a 'recent' emergent property, of some of the hierarchically-organized systems that characterize the many (sometimes competing) complex systems we observe throughout the natural world.

Are we currently participants in a follow-on emergence??
Lyle Ridings Avatar
Lyle Ridings
Posts: 17
Posted: 03.02.11, 07:21 AM
marcomauas,
Seek medical help for those parasites in your head; my neurons and genes are working just fine.
Stick to your field of expertise - mumbo-jumbo, and leave real Science to real Scientists.
marcomauas Avatar
marcomauas
Posts: 9
Posted: 03.02.11, 05:49 AM
Yes, hopscotch is simply language. And this is something Mr Sapolsky does not give as much as importance as he is ready to give to "neurons", "genes", and all the mumbo-jumbo that we humans suffer as a parasite sounding in our ears as part of our civilization.
Language is a parasite. James Joyce was able to feel it. Jacques Lacan, psychoanalyst, was able to trace it.
Fora2 Avatar
Fora2
Posts: 93
Posted: 02.25.11, 10:21 PM
Probably the most important differences between chimps and humans are "language" & "tool making"
Language allows us to communicate, store knowledge, & think. We use language to THINK. Thinking is just "talking to ourself". That ability to speak, understand speech, and think is probably the evolutionary driver that selected for humans with larger brains. We remember thoughts with language. Now we make books, libraries, & databases.
The second evolutionary driver that separates humans from chimps is the ability to design and use tools. Tools give us enormous power over our environment - from fire, spears, wheels & plows to cars, air conditioners, TVs & computers.
Otherwise, we're just naked apes.
The Isolation Party Avatar
The Isolation Party
Posts: 2
Posted: 02.24.11, 06:13 PM
the john lennon of neurobiology/primatology. amazing mind.
NO ADS + DOWNLOADS + HQ VIEWING
UPGRADE TO FORA.tv PLUS