In the early 1990s, Harvard political scientist Samuel Huntington developed his famous "clash of civilizations" theory. In it, he argued that history is driven by distinct international forces, like Islam and the west, competing for supremacy. This seemed to be illustrated by the events of 9/11.
However, delivering this lecture at the University of Sydney, world-renowned political scientist Peter Katzenstein argued that the view that civilizations comprise of homogenous racial and religious groups is simplistic and untrue. Rather, civilizations are pluralistic and highly diverse within themselves, and more likely to engage with each other than to clash.
Bio
Peter Katzenstein
Peter J. Katzenstein is the President of the American Political Science Association and the Walter S. Carpenter, Jr. Professor of International Studies at Cornell University. He received his PhD at Harvard University, and also has degrees from the London School of Economics and Swarthmore College.
He has written several books and articles on political science and international relations. His latest book Beyond Paradigms: Analytic Eclecticism in World Politics will be published in 2010.
In political science, the view that in liberal democracies power is (or should be) dispersed among a variety of economic and ideological pressure groups and is not (or should not be) held by a single elite or group of elites. Pluralism assumes that diversity is beneficial to society and that the disparate functional or cultural groups of which society is composedincluding religious groups, trade unions, professional organizations, and ethnic minoritiesshould be autonomous. Pluralism was stressed most vigorously during the early 20th century by a group of English writers that included Frederic W. Maitland and Harold J. Laski; it was defended in the later 20th century by the American scholars Robert Dahl and David B. Truman.
Quote:
Originally Posted by theknopfknows
Peter`s accent sounds famaliar, maybe Austrian like myself, European for sure. As with Bernard Lewis at Princton, number One Islamic historian, Samuel Huntington left out much. Sometimes what is not written is equally important to the written.What one leaves out as with Clash of civilization, Samuel, what he left out was equally important. Since Islam has always spread first in poverty areas. N. Africa, Middle East,Afghanistan,Pakistan, Indonesia etc. where ever poverty rules, Islam moves in. Islam needs an enemy to have an Identity, Unity among Muslims only comes through common Enemy, Israel-Jews to have an Identity. Violence provides identity. Finally all roads in Islam leads to paradise through death, a life here after destroys the present. A life here after has no NOW! Allah Akbar! is the chosen destiny! yet no one debates this KORANIC VISION!
Did you ever take any history class in you life? Islam did not spread through poverty idiot. Guess what a thousand years ago Europe was a sh*thole and the richest place in the world was Afghanistan(silk road), Pakistan didn't exist India did. India was one of the most richest place in the world during that time. Muslims actually created the "TajMahal". Indonesia too was a rich place where there were many natural resources along with Malaysia.
You seem to confuse todays world to a thousand year old world.
The only reason Europe is developed today is because of colonialism of those Muslim/ third world countries. And the reason North America is developed because of black slavery(of which many of the victims were African-Muslim) and Native American, Mexican blood.
PS: I'm in 10th grade and I know better than you.
Peter`s accent sounds famaliar, maybe Austrian like myself, European for sure. As with Bernard Lewis at Princton, number One Islamic historian, Samuel Huntington left out much. Sometimes what is not written is equally important to the written.What one leaves out as with Clash of civilization, Samuel, what he left out was equally important. Since Islam has always spread first in poverty areas. N. Africa, Middle East,Afghanistan,Pakistan, Indonesia etc. where ever poverty rules, Islam moves in. Islam needs an enemy to have an Identity, Unity among Muslims only comes through common Enemy, Israel-Jews to have an Identity. Violence provides identity. Finally all roads in Islam leads to paradise through death, a life here after destroys the present. A life here after has no NOW! Allah Akbar! is the chosen destiny! yet no one debates this KORANIC VISION!