Conferences Series Events
RELIGION   |   GAMING   |   FILM   |   FASHION   |   SEX   |   PHILOSOPHY   |   EDUCATION   |   HISTORY   |   ARTS   |   MUSIC   |   TRAVEL   |   PHOTOGRAPHY

Uncommon Knowledge: Fox and More with Roger Ailes

More from this partner:

13
Likes
0
Dislikes
RATE
4,798 Views

  • Info
  • Bio
  • Chapters
  • Preview
  • Download
  • More
  • Transcript
Please or register to post a comment.

Mark Sullivan Avatar
Mark Sullivan
Posts: 160
Posted: 03.10.10, 09:58 AM
balthazar,

I think you and I may have different things in mind when we say "democracy." "We the People" is anthropomorphism. It implies a "general will" (where have we heard that?), that the 300 million+ American citizens are in lockstep with respect to economics and what freedom means. This is intellectual laziness. The simple fact that you and I disagree debunks the notion of "We the People" as a homogemous entity. The Constitution and the Bill of Rights lay out the rights of the INDIVIDUAL, not some amorphous "People." Your desire to energize "the People" to shake down other private citizens or legal corporate entities to pay your way, whether it be health care, college tuition or other European style welfare state structures. We simply disagree on this. As a Constituitonal believer, you must know that the Fifth Ammendment's "takings" clause underscores the notion of several property and states that, " . . .nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compehnsation." I see my hard earned wages, my land , my home, my investments, stocks, bonds, my business, etc., as my private property, which cannot be taken "without just compensation." You seem to imply my property and the property of others is just more booty to be plundered by the wishes of a disaffected "People," and redistributed. I simply do not see how this is just.

As far as the minimum wage goes, I believe it is one of the worst economic policies ever enacted and should be abolished. The Federal government has no place enetering into the contracting of labor between two individuals. It is not, either in intent or practice, "legislated poverty," as very few people earn the minimum wage as their sole means of support. Teenagers and college students, working their way up the economic ladder, unskilled, uneducated people and illegal aliens are the primary earners of minimum wages. These jobs are not intended to be careers. I am more concerned by the minority unemployment rates caused by the imposition of a minimum wage. The Minimum wage is yet another feel-good measure which has the opposite effect than what was intended (like most Federal busybody legislation). Additionally, census statisics show and countless studies indicate that we are tremendously upwardly mobile. When followed through the course of their lives, most people on the minimum wage, in the lowest income cohort, will be among those in the highest income cohort later in life. Age, work experience, skills and education matter. You seem to ignore them.

If the KIng for a Day, would you require a "Living Wage?" (whatever that means) HOw much would that be? My guess is that if the minimum wage was a salary of $50K per year, you would still be complaining that some eveil corporate CEO was making $50 Million per year. You are chasing the non-existent, Rousseau-inspired mirage of equality of conditions. This has never occurred in any society in any time in any place. Attempts at creating it have been the source of the most horriffic evil man has ever perpetrated upon himself.

The United States Constitution is a concervative, limited, short, frustratingly general document. The promise of a "Republican form of government," seperation of powers and very few enumerated powers to the Federal government are what keep us free. "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." United States Constitution, Ammendment X. You seem to think that this means something other than what it does. This does not empower the Federal Government, fueled by "The Will of the People," to grab non enumerated powers at will. This is a statement of Federalism, keeping the Federal Government out of the daily lives of citizens, recognizing that decisions on most issues are best made locally, where those in charge can be held accountable, and innocent bystanders cannot be harmed. There is a specific, organized way for "The People" to cede power to the Federal Government - Constitutional Ammendments. Sadly, the left has found another way - judges - to force through, without legal basis, what they have failed to convince their fellow citizens to vote for. The word "abortion" is not in the Constitution, but the decision in Roe Vs. Wade says it was. This is the danger of your free-for-all limitless "democracy."

I guess we will have to agree to disagree on what the Constitution means and what the relationship between the citizen and the State ought to be. Isn't America great?
RMarkey Avatar
RMarkey
Posts: 10
Posted: 03.10.10, 08:17 AM
Riveting conversation between Mark Sullivan and balthazarF.

However, to the point: It is clear from Ailes position, that he does not pay attention to or comprehend the content of the FOX newsopinions shows; he and his ilk are nothing more than dangerous propagandists; in fact they are the REAL terrorists. That he is given ADDITIONAL coverage at FORA does not expand the discussion or understanding of civitas in America; his stage is FOX and you can see re-runs on you tube.
balthazarF Avatar
balthazarF
Posts: 70
Posted: 03.10.10, 06:30 AM
Mark Sullivan, Show me in the Constitution where capitalism, free market, corporation, partnership, business structure or any other quaint term of capitalist apologists appears in the Constitution. Correct my factual errors.

Those items don't occur in the Constitution, which means that they have no entitlements. They are subject to the will of We The People. Factually refute that.

Now show me how the Legislated Minimum Wage, a wage which ensures poverty, does not violate Article I, Section 10, Clause 1.

I know enough about capitalism and American history to know that tens of millions of Americans are living in poverty because of legislation enacted for special interests fails We The People. I know that when one works to live in poverty one cannot afford health care. I know from experience that hard work guarantees no reward in capitalism. And I know that the nation is in the condition it is in because of capitalism and capitalists. The condition America is economically in cannot be laid on the doorstep of any other economic. Demonstrate my factual errors.

I know the historic failures of unregulated capitalism and that no matter what lipstick its apologists paint on it, unregulated capitalism fails the majority and rewards only a few. Demonstrate any factual error.

I know that in its very structure capitalism is anti-democratic. Demonstrate otherwise with facts.

I know that in its very structure corporations, a capitist tool, are undemocratic. Demonstrate otherwise with facts.

I know that American is a constitutional, democratic republic whose authority comes from and resides with the people. Demonstrate otherwise with facts.

You say I am incoherent. I say you cannot refute the facts. I say you cannot show me that corporations are democratic in their very structure. I say you cannot demonstrate a democratic nature in capitalism. I say it is easier for you to attack me, the person, than to refute the anti-democratic nature of capitalism, which is an economic and not a political theory.

What John Adams asserted is John Adams' opinion. Demonstrate otherwise with fact.

"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare,and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America." is the stated purpose for that which follows. Refute that.
Mark Sullivan Avatar
Mark Sullivan
Posts: 160
Posted: 03.09.10, 07:34 PM
balthazarF,

Your comments are rambling, incoherent and factually incorrect and I do not see how they relate to Mr. Ailes' interview in any respect. I strongly urge you to read the United States Constitution and The Federalist. You have no understanding of the Constitution or Capitalism. You do seem to have a tyrannical reflex to how we should all live and you imply that this is what our Constitution requires as well.

Additionally, the "general welfare" clause has been explained by John Adams many times. He asserted that this "general welfare" is provided only through the enumerated powers in the Constitution and that the Federal Government does not have unlimited powers.

Grimwatcher,

Your assertion that the "biased, chauvanistic . . ." version of history no longer taught has been replaced by an "objective" history is nonsense! A history dedicated to the generational transmission of ancient truths, and the foundations of what makes Western Civilization far superior to any other is important for a nation's continuity. No version of history holds the United States not guilty of serious moral and ploitical failings. A Dishonest history id one that focuses ONLY on our mistakes. For example, the United States is not at all unique in having had legal slavery. What is unique is that we ended slavery and worked to end it throughout the world. If we were to teach "objective" history, stupid teenagers would not be wearing Che Guevara T-Shirts. The Kennedy Family would not be glorified by anyone. FDR would not be a hero. No sane person would see anything redeeming in Fidel Castro, Joseph Stalin or any of the other totalitarians with whom academia's, journalism's and government's leftists are so enamored with. I believe an honest history, with each occurrence in its proper perpective is what is needed. The United States has only been in existence for 234 years. On balance, I cannot see how one could conclude we have not been a net positive for the people of the world.
balthazarF Avatar
balthazarF
Posts: 70
Posted: 03.09.10, 08:33 AM
Is Democracy The Pursuit Of Capital?

Mr. Ailes claims he is, "strong on national defense".

Mr. Ailes, how does a citizenry which is unhealthy relate to the defense of the nation?

For-profit health insurance is obligated to the stockholders, not the insured.

America's legislated wage of poverty has caused tens of millions of Americans to work in order to live in poverty. Poverty keeps tens of millions of Americans from affording for-profit health insurance and from participation in the national economic as capitalists. How does such legislation benefit the national defense, Mr. Ailes? Legislating poverty did not come from communism, socialism or any other economic. It is derived from capitalism. A broad base of poverty is essential for capitalism to be successful for the few.

All of the media mentioned by Mr. Ailes, including PBS, promote the middle class apologia for an anti-democratic national economic, capitalism.

"What we do every day is go on the air with two points of view of the news," Mr. Ailes. Note that Mr. Ailes does not reveal what those two views are. Just take his claim on faith. Or does he mean by two views that, not only does Fox promote the middle class apologia it also promotes Christian (capital is divine?) sectariantism?

Just incidentally, Beck, O'Reilly, et al., are not news reporters. They are political apologists/commentators. This discussion is about commentary and opinion not news, yet the argument is presented to Mr. Ailes as if the premise provided by the interviewer were true. So Mr. Ailes runs with that ball, to the loss of the audience.

"To be honest with you, if all the media tipped to the right...", Mr. Ailes.

When the USSR failed, the capitalists (not democracy) claimed victory. America's two political parties moved further to the right, the Dems moving to where moderate Republicans had been and Republicans moving even further right with their neocon platform. There has not been a "left" in the media for at least three decades. Mr. Ailes, there is a clear need for you to become honest. You will never become liberal.

"The American people have got to understand that everything the government does costs money, and there are only two places to get it, their wallet or to print it, and to print it reduces the money in their wallet," Mr. Ailes.

I suggest that what the American people have got to understand is that We The People ARE the government and We The People ARE responsible for where the nation is today because We The People elected the representatives of We The People to our legislative and executive offices And the American people have got to understand WE CAN change those representatives, but not as long as there are just two parties, both promoting anti-democratic economics. (If you keep doing the same thing over and over while expecting different results, that is insanity, Einstein)

What the American people have got to understand is the purpose We The People have set for our nation, and that purpose includes for us to "promote the general welfare".

Capitalists are especially good at political misdirection. Capital, capitalism, profit, free market and economic theory are absent from the Constitution, the sole thing Americans hold in common.

Capital is fungible and has no national obligations. Capitalism is anti-democratic in its very nature. Corporations are undemocratic in their very structure. We The People have the constitutional authority and responsibility to regulate and tax capitalism and capitalists in order to promote the general welfare and defend the Constitution's democratic principles.

Empty arguments such as that presented by Ailes are the norm for the individuals and institutions which hold capital as being superior to our constitutionally democratic republic.

Ask a conservetive what it is she/he is trying to conserve. The Constitution is liberal (It is not static but amendable). It was made that way to give it and the Nation the best chance for survival.

From the falseness of argument presented here one should question the excess wages of both participants. There is precedence in promoting the general welfare and defending the nation to legislatively limit the income of economic apologists to the poverty they stand for. The poverty promoted by the capitalist apology is extreme and more harmful to America than an extremist in a foreign land.

Notice that Mr. Ailes does not propose having public schools in the poorest districts hire capitalists to teach capitalism to those legislated to remain in poverty, unable to acquire capital.

While Mr. Ailes does speak to anti-democratic economics, his speech is protected by the democracy his economic attacks.

Capitalism has just one requirement, capital; it has just one goal, more capital.

Ever notice that administrators and teachers at "failed schools" are themselves products of American education?

Ever wonder why a capitalist would want to be educated for a job?

Ever hear of Woodrow Wilson the educator and his educational model?

Are you an informed American?
Grimwatcher Avatar
Grimwatcher
Posts: 1
Posted: 03.09.10, 01:12 AM
Yup, American schools have killed the old American History. They have killed the chauvinistic, factually untrue biased, propaganda, which glorified genocide and provided only one side of history. Though still imperfect, it's a good thing Schools nowadays are not afraid to educate our youth in objective history, even those parts of history that seem unpleasant to us.
rocketdog Avatar
rocketdog
Posts: 211
Posted: 03.08.10, 09:20 AM
I never realized how much Roger Ailes looks like Darth Vader without the mask. It's uncanny.
D Bucks Avatar
D Bucks
Posts: 2
Posted: 03.08.10, 07:16 AM
WHAT?! Fox news is riddled with factual errors! I've emailed Glen Beck dozens of times on his "facts".
Advertisement
NO ADS + DOWNLOADS + HQ VIEWING
UPGRADE TO FORA.tv PLUS
Advertisement


LAW  |   ECONOMY  |   STEVE JOBS  |   INVESTING  |   MARKETING  |   ENTREPRENEURSHIP  |   RECOVERY  |   ECONOMIC POLICY  |   GLOBALIZATION  |   EMERGING MARKETS
CLIMATE CHANGE  |   ENERGY  |   SUSTAINABILITY  |   ENVIRONMENT  |   TRANSPORTATION  |   POLICY  |   BUILDINGS
OCCUPY WALL STREET  |   ELECTION 2012  |   MUSLIM WORLD  |   HEALTHCARE  |   SOCIAL ISSUES  |   FOREIGN POLICY  |   TERRORISM  |   CAPITOL HILL
SPACE  |   EVOLUTION  |   PHYSICS  |   SOCIAL SCIENCES  |   NATURAL SCIENCES  |   DNA  |   PSYCHOLOGY  |   BIOTECH  |   MEDICINE  |   ANTHROPOLOGY  |   ASTRONOMY
INTERNET  |   NEW MEDIA  |   START-UPS  |   PERSONAL TECHNOLOGY  |   WIRELESS  |   COMPUTING  |   ENGINEERING  |   CEOS
RELIGION  |   GAMING  |   FILM  |   FASHION  |   SEX  |   PHILOSOPHY  |   EDUCATION  |   HISTORY  |   ARTS  |   MUSIC  |   TRAVEL  |   PHOTOGRAPHY
Watch Now