Climate Change | Energy | Sustainability | Environment | Transportation | Policy | Buildings

FORA.tv Exclusive Interview with Lord Monckton @ COP15

More from this conference:

COP15: Climate Summit in Copenhagen

More videos from these partners:

and COP15
13
Likes
0
Dislikes
RATE

  • Info
  • Bio
  • Chapters
  • Preview
  • Download
  • Zoom In
Advertisement
There are 15 comments on this program

Please or register to post a comment.
Previous FORAtv comments:
alfredote Avatar
alfredote
Posted: 05.21.11, 12:17 AM
Why should the global warming facts cherry-picked by this “ viscount … politician, business consultant, policy adviser, writer, columnist, inventor and hereditary peer ” be more relevant than the facts pointed to by the overwhelming majority of people who have spent their lives studying the problem? This guy hasn’t got what even Bjorn Lomborg has explicitly admitted: ‘ Global warming is real, it is man-made, it is a problem,’ ‘Unfortunately, we only have virtually one solution: cut carbon emissions dramatically, right now[ ,’ Bjørn Lomborg, on 15 December 2009, at the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen, Denmark http://fora.tv/2009/12/15/FORAtv_Exc...mborg_at_COP15
Fora2 Avatar
Fora2
Posted: 07.04.10, 07:15 PM
Dr. Abraham has a letter online (6/6/10) answering Monckton's objections (6/4/10) Search: Abraham reply to Monckton (6/6/10) skepticalscience.com/Abraham-reply-to-Monckton For the original full debunking of Monckton, documented and annotated, Search: Abraham presentation stthomas.edu/engineering/jpabraham
Fora2 Avatar
Fora2
Posted: 06.12.10, 07:13 PM
CHRIS MONCKTON (10/14/09) was "FACT-CHECKED" by a real scientist. Oops!!! Here is a brilliant "point-by-point" annotated refutation of Lord Monckton’s unabashed lies & disinformation regarding: CO2 levels & global warming Sea Level rise Melting polar ice Polar Bears Medieval Warm Period Ocean Acidification Solar Irradiance See YouTube: Abraham vs. Monckton /watch?v=QpOrjaWlC_E (John Abraham, PhD, is a Professor of Engineering (Thermal & Fluid Mechanics) with 80 published papers & patents.)
tobyjoyce Avatar
tobyjoyce
Posted: 01.18.10, 12:34 PM
Logos said "What the emails show us btw, in detail, was that there was collusion and conspiracy to suppress information that counters their cause" Eh? ...that counters the cause of the emails? That's gibberish! Only 3 emails from the thousands stolen are being quoted exensively out of context. And the "hockey stick" graph has not been refuted ... I note you do not supply any reference or link to further information ... your assertions cannot be taken at face value alone.
LOGOS Avatar
LOGOS
Posted: 01.15.10, 03:06 PM
Quote: Originally Posted by tobyjoyce Dear Logos, You are wrong, dead wrong. The hacked correspondence from the University of East Anglia had no evidence whatsoever that the "hockey stick" was fruadulent. See http://www.desmogblog.com/truth-out-...ng-keep-it-out Besides, both NASA & the Met Office Hadley Centre had constructed climate graphs independently of the UEA, so even if there was a sliver of doubt, you can see the "hockey stick" in all its glory here: http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/ Enjoy. You've misread my post. The fraudulent hockey stick graph comment wasn't tied to the comment about the hacked computers in East Anglia. Two different events. What the emails show us btw, in detail, was that there was collusion and conspiracy to suppress information that counters their cause. And yes, I do mean 'cause'. LOGOS
tobyjoyce Avatar
tobyjoyce
Posted: 01.15.10, 12:21 PM
Dear Logos, You are wrong, dead wrong. The hacked correspondence from the University of East Anglia had no evidence whatsoever that the "hockey stick" was fruadulent. See http://www.desmogblog.com/truth-out-...ng-keep-it-out Besides, both NASA & the Met Office Hadley Centre had constructed climate graphs independently of the UEA, so even if there was a sliver of doubt, you can see the "hockey stick" in all its glory here: http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/ Enjoy.
LOGOS Avatar
LOGOS
Posted: 01.15.10, 02:20 AM
It's interesting to read some of the comments in this thread that are pro-global warming. It's interesting considering that the "hockey stick graph" (different one that Lord Monckton was talking about) based on evidence as flimsy as counting and measuring tree rings, has been proved to be statistically fraudulent, and in light of the recent email correspondence "hacked" from a British university showing conspiracy to defraud. Yes, I find this interesting indeed. LOGOS
tobyjoyce Avatar
tobyjoyce
Posted: 01.14.10, 08:30 AM
Watch Dan Miller out-Goring Gore on FORA TV: http://fora.tv/2009/08/18/A_REALLY_I...uth_Dan_Miller Still, Al Gore is a credit to the political system he came from.
tobyjoyce Avatar
tobyjoyce
Posted: 01.14.10, 08:27 AM
You mean Al Gore makes paid-for speeches arguing for action on climate change, so he has a "vested interest". I'm shocked, SHOCKED! But, hang on, doesn't Monckton get paid for making speeches against climate change? I am sure he makes a tidy profit. Wouldn't you say he has a vested interest in keeping up his rolling farce? http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/?utm...edium=dropdown
darren d Avatar
darren d
Posted: 01.13.10, 09:57 PM
It is great to see people still have the guts to challenge the majority even if it is seen as blasphamy to this new religion. You rock Lord Monckton. Found this article from November 1922 regarding climate change very interesting http://www.sott.net/articles/show/20...Icebergs-Melt-
Advertisement

Advertisement