Conferences Series Events
SPACE   |   EVOLUTION   |   PHYSICS   |   SOCIAL SCIENCES   |   NATURAL SCIENCES   |   DNA   |   PSYCHOLOGY   |   BIOTECH   |   MEDICINE   |   ANTHROPOLOGY   |   ASTRONOMY
INTERNET   |   NEW MEDIA   |   START-UPS   |   PERSONAL TECHNOLOGY   |   WIRELESS   |   COMPUTING   |   ENGINEERING   |   CEOS
RELIGION   |   GAMING   |   FILM   |   FASHION   |   SEX   |   PHILOSOPHY   |   EDUCATION   |   HISTORY   |   ARTS   |   MUSIC   |   TRAVEL   |   PHOTOGRAPHY
Watch Now

FORA.tv Exclusive Interview with Bill McKibben @ COP15

and COP15
5
Likes
0
Dislikes
RATE
3,400 Views

  • Info
  • Bio
  • Chapters
  • Highlights
  • Transcript
  • Download
  • More
Please or register to post a comment.

Sean van der Lee Avatar
Sean van der Lee
Posts: 1
Posted: 12.20.09, 01:16 AM
I'm skeptical (there's that word) about treating a computer program, however sophisticated, as comprehensive enough to provide even a ballpark simulation of a system as complex as that of Earth's climate. Are these guys even thinking or just plugging numbers into a flawed program and reinforcing their worst fears?
Richard Guy Avatar
Richard Guy
Posts: 21
Posted: 12.18.09, 05:31 AM
The Copenhagen Meeting is necessary because it highlights the major issue of Global Warming Globally. Global Warming is a fact of life we can see it all around us. The issue I have a problem with is the rising sea level forcast. Sea levels are not rising and will not rise. The old concept of sea level being a constant has to go. A constant sea level has misled all of us for too long. It is time that we study sea level and its decline. This will give the lie to sea level rise forcasts. Geology has to get rid of Isostatic Rebound it is a false theory.It is also the root cause of the sea level rise forecasts. We dont know sea level so we cant forcast that it will rise. We are only sure of one thing and that is that sea levels will fall.
Richard Guy
Advertisement
NO ADS + DOWNLOADS + HQ VIEWING
UPGRADE TO FORA.tv PLUS
Advertisement