Drawing on his experience first as state attorney general and later as governor of New York, Eliot Spitzer addresses a wide range of issues having to do with the relationship between the government and the marketplace.
Bio
Lawrence Lessig
Lawrence Lessig is a professor of law at Stanford Law School and founder of the school's Center for Internet and Society.
He teaches and writes in the areas of constitutional law, contracts, and the law of cyberspace. Prior to joining the Stanford faculty, he was Berkman Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and a professor at the University of Chicago.
He clerked for Judge Richard Posner on the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals and for Justice Antonin Scalia on the United States Supreme Court. For much of his career, he has focused on law and technology, especially as it affects copyright.
Recognized for arguing against interpretations of copyright that could stifle innovation and discourse online, he is CEO of the Creative Commons project, and he has been a columnist for Wired, Red Herring, and The Industry Standard.
Eliot Spitzer
Eliot Laurence Spitzer is an American lawyer, politician and the former Governor of New York. Spitzer was elected governor in the November 2006 election.
He is the former New York State Attorney General, a member of the Democratic Party, and is married to Silda Wall Spitzer, the founder and chair of Children for Children, a non-profit organization.
Which government is he talking about? The economic government or political government? This is a useless talk because the government has essentially no control over the economy because of the powers that be that control the stock of money. The only way governments should intervene is to responsibly control the stock of money. He talks about regulation failing, bla bla (usual bullshit), but what's the point when the government is not even in a position to control its own stock of money ? He's distracting you.
The stock of money is controlled within the US by the Federal Reserve which ironically is not federal (a government body) nor does it have any reserves. It is simply a private organisation that the US delegated the authority to control the stock of US money and acts within its own private interest of financial gain. Don't believe me? Look up the Federal Reserve in a telephone book you will find it in the business, not the government section.
Instead of this distraction of a 'lecture' and if he wants the government to do something.. repeal the Federal Reserve act, GATT and withdraw from the world bank. Then issue money that is directly correlated with population growth. This has been done in the past and currently (Guernsey) with great success because populations and governments are not enslaved into paying back vast amounts of interest payments. War, slavery, poverty, starvation, famine and world control in the hands of the IMF, World Bank, Fed and BOE are the root of all economic peril because all of these horrors generate vast amounts of debt and therefore interest (profit) for central banks.
Remember, the Fed that are supposedly saving us from economic peril through their interventions had caused 3 major recessions including the great depression within 25 years of their inaction. In no other time in US history had such economic problems existed within the powers of a central bank in the US. The government is merely a powerless economic face.
"Any system which gives so much power and so much discretion to a few men, so that mistakes - excusable or not - can have such far reaching effects is a bad system. It is a bad system to believers in freedom just because it gives a few men such power without any affective check by the body public - this is the key political argument against an independent central bank" -- Friedman.