Paul Krugman - Paul Krugman joined The New York Times in 1999 as a columnist on the Op-Ed Page and continues as professor of Economics and International Affairs at Princeton University.
Mr. Krugman received his B.A. from Yale University in 1974 and his Ph.D. from MIT in 1977. He has taught at Yale, MIT and Stanford. At MIT he became the Ford International Professor of Economics.
Mr. Krugman is the author or editor of 20 books and more than 200 papers in professional journals and edited volumes. His professional reputation rests largely on work in international trade and finance; he is one of the founders of the "new trade theory," a major rethinking of the theory of international trade. Mr. Krugman's current academic research is focused on economic and currency crises.
At the same time, Mr. Krugman has written extensively for a broader public audience. Some of his recent articles on economic issues, originally published in Foreign Affairs, Harvard Business Review, Scientific American and other journals, are reprinted in Pop Internationalism and The Accidental Theorist.
New York Times columnist and Nobel economist Paul Krugman comes to the Hudson Union Society to talk about the aftermath of the global economic crisis.
He discusses what it will take to make a full recovery, and explores how issues ranging from cap and trade legislation to healthcare reform will affect America's economy.
He has always made his views on his "prescriptions" very public, to the point where, if people would have asked, he may have glossed over them with generalizations at this point. He's a Keynesian economist. His bailout would have likely been larger by 300-500 billion. His stimulus package would have amounted to a major public works program much larger than the current stimulus which is aimed primarily at job creation/retention in the areas of infrastructure maintenance. (Highways, schools, etc.)
Krugman draws comfort from analogies to past situations.
This is far fetched when one or more of the main factors are different.
He takes no notice of the factors that have made the US a less productive
society in almost all sectors except software, and that too has rapidly growing competition.
The return to an economy where most asset values include the expectation of significant growth is highly unlikely. The transition to a primarily low-growth economy will be slow, costly, and painful.
On cap and trade he notes it may have 'some costs' - greatly understated.
For the lower third of the income spectrum - costs of essential can rise sharply with energy costs.
Energy costs represent more than half of the cost of most foods. We are likely to see breadlines like the 1930's - as part of the price of too hasty enforcement of cap and trade.
Krugman doesn't seem to have a clue.
Mr. Krugman, if you think that the economy is going down the drain why did you go and buy an over a million dollar apartment in New York with the nobel prize money you received and didn't wait for the market to go lower and thus buy it at a better price?
The worst thing about economic stimulus packages is not that they are enormously expensive, it is that they don't work. And then the government, to make up for it's failure, does it again.
This is not a new story.
But what would "liberals" do if there was a real, physical crisis? Nationally. Say, a global winter after a volcano and 3/4ths of crops failed and ash covered your car for weeks. In such a crisis, would it seem pleasing to the liberal mind, to have the government come to your home and tell you when to wake up, what to eat, what to buy on which day? Is that the appropriate response in a crisis?