Professors Carlos Bustamante and John Kuriyan discuss the possibility of creating simple life forms in the laboratory.
Wonderfest, the Bay Area Festival of Science, is held each year in the beginning of November. Enjoy fascinating discussions between world-class scientists on cutting edge topics, as well as other fun exhibitions. Visit Wonderfest.org and join.
Bio
Carlos Bustamante
Bustamante is professor of molecular and cell biology, physics, and chemistry at the University of California, Berkeley, a position he has held since 1998. He received his B.S. degree from Cayetano Heredia University in Lima, his masters in biochemistry from San Marcos University, and his Ph.D. degree in biophysics from UC Berkeley, where he studied with Ignacio Tinoco, Jr. As a postdoctoral fellow at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Bustamante studied with Marc Maestre. Before moving to Berkeley, he was an HHMI investigator at the University of Oregon.
Carlos Bustamante uses novel methods of single-molecule visualization, such as scanning force microscopy, to study the structure and function of nucleoprotein assemblies. His laboratory is developing methods of single-molecule manipulation, such as optical tweezers, to characterize the elasticity of DNA, to induce the mechanical unfolding of individual protein molecules, and to investigate the machine-like behavior of molecular motors.
John Kuriyan
John Kuriyan is currently Chancellor's Professor at the University of California Berkeley in the departments of Molecular and Cell Biology (MCB) and Chemistry. He is also a Faculty Scientist in Berkeley Lab's Physical Biosciences Division, a Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator, and a member of the National Academy of Sciences. Kuriyan received his B.S. in chemistry from Juniata College in Pennsylvania, followed by his PhD at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology under Gregory Petsko and Martin Karplus. He did postdoctoral work for one year under Karplus at Harvard before becoming an assistant professor at the Rockefeller University.
Kuriyan's laboratory studies the structure and mechanism of enzymes and other proteins that transduce cellular signals and perform DNA replication. The laboratory primarily uses x-ray crystallography to determine 3-D protein structures as well as biochemical, biophysical, and computational techniques to uncover the mechanisms used by these proteins.
Christopher McKee
Christopher Fulton McKee is an astrophysicist. McKee obtained a Ph.D. from the University of California, Berkeley (UCB) in 1970 under advisor George Field. In 1974, he was appointed Professor of Physics and Astronomy, University of California at Berkeley. He is a member of the National Academy of Sciences and has been chair of the UCB Physics Department. He is a former member (1990) and chairman (2000) of the NASA Astronomy and Astrophysics Survey Committee (the "decade review") and former Director of the Space Sciences Laboratory (SSL) at UCB.
McKee performed the first simulations of relativistic counter-streaming plasmas as part of his Ph.D. thesis at Berkeley (1970). He began his study of the interstellar medium by pointing out the existence of reverse shocks in young supernova remnants, and he then analyzed the interaction of a supernova blast wave with interstellar clouds. Since joining the Physics and Astronomy Departments in Berkeley in 1974, he has devoted much of his research to studying processes in the interstellar medium, including evaporation of clouds, the structure of shock waves in atomic and molecular gas, and the dynamics of blast waves in both homogeneous and inhomogeous media. In collaboration with Jeremiah Ostriker (Princeton University), he developed the three-phase model of the interstellar medium, which has been widely used to organize and interpret observational data.
His research on quasars has included development of the relativistic blast wave model for variability, introduction of reverberation mapping to analyze variable emission line profiles, the two-phase model for quasar emission line regions, and the development of the theory of coronae and winds from accretion disks.
There is a TED video that shows a demonstration of 2 metronomes set off at different times but beating at the same BPM on the same table. It takes them only a few seconds to synchronize. (If someone can find it, please post it.)
I believe that is an observational experience of self-assembly.
I don't think anyone yet understands why this happens, but we don't even understand gravity on the micro scale yet. Thankfully, we have many generations of learning to go.
This "life force", i.e. the ability to self-assemble is nothing more (and nothing less) than thermodynamics. Molecules (just like atoms) attract each other due to electrostatic (and quantum mechanical) interaction. The average force of this attraction is expressed in an energy functional which is a function of distance and orientation of the molecules. The fundamental laws of physics are such that systems always "strive" to minimize these energy terms. Just like two magnets, left to their own devices, will attach to each other at their magnetic poles to form a larger magnet of smaller total magnetic energy, two proteins will attach to each other to form a larger molecule of smaller electrostatic (etc.) energy. Thermal movements in the water solution help to shake things up so that (after finite, albeit sometimes very long time), this energy minimum can be approximately found. The result is self organization. It's a beautiful phenomenon that can be observed in many inorganic as well as organic systems.
It is a stunning mechanism, but, after all, it is only a mechanism that follows immediately from the fundamentally conservative laws of physics. It can't be any other way in a universe in which all dynamic equations are based on least action principles.
I don't believe the observational experience that self-assembly and complex behavior appear naturally in seemingly mechanistic systems takes anything away from the stunning beauty that we can find in our universe as a result of something as fundamentally abstract as a action integral.
That, of course, is just my opinion. I like the thought of living in a universe where what you see is what you get. There is no need to shout "Don't pay attention to the man behind the curtain!" because the machine is proudly showing all its parts to us. The only thing between us and full understanding is the effort it takes to analyze the machinery. And that effort has, so far, filled hundreds of thousands, if not millions of lives with joy and it will be many, many more.
Viruses have already been made. Just create the DNA and have a cell do the making. As for cells, I would think this is already being done to greater degrees right now.
I would bet your speaker is way out of date.
I agree insofar as you describe a cell as complex, but the "vitalism" that you are invoking as a necessary prerequisite for life is an archaic notion when the chemistry of life was not as well understood as today. While I am not trying to convey a sense of complete understanding of these interactions, I am suggesting that there is a threshold of knowledge that can be crossed, potentially imminently, that can account for an order in the synthesis of life. Using rhetorical devices of examples of present ignorance does not support your original thesis of a "force" guiding these processes any more than ignorance disproves the concept. However, it is meaningless speculation. I am not meaning to insult your idea, but to state that it is unsupported by current evidence and particularly by the evidence you cited.
Great lecture. Inspiring. What really bothers me is attributing self-assembly and self-organisation of the cells as mere virtue. Like as if it is built into them. I wonder if my disbelief is due my being a complex organism, who doesn't see this kind of assembly in my everyday life. It is very temping to attribute a eternal "force", if I may use a star wars lingo, to this drive for simple molecules to arrange themselves. I think sufficient consideration should also be given to the notion that there may be indeed be an ever present order, or "spirit" (not in any theological sense) that drives these cells to self-assemble. We must dive deeper than the cellular level to atomic and even quantum level to find what really is causing this drive to assemble. Sometimes things that we just take for granted, like gravity, can be really "magical" when we think of it at deeper levels. Have you really ever asked yourself how and why two objects are attracted to each other? Answering it with use of abstruse concepts such as gravitons will only take the question to the next round, what then is the graviton. We as humans have so much to learn.