Born in Prague, Czechoslovakia, in 1941 during WW II, Vaclav Klaus grew up during the Cold War. After earning a doctorate in economics, he pursued a career in academia and at the Czechoslovak State Bank. Immediately after the Velvet Revolution of 1989, Klaus entered politics. A founder of the Civic Democratic Party, he served from 1992 to 1997 as prime minister of the Czech Republic. In 2003 he was elected president, a position to which he was reelected in 2008.
In retelling his experience of living through the Velvet Revolution, the fall of the Berlin Wall, and the lifting of the Iron Curtain, Vaclav Klaus offers his views on what students today need to understand about life under communism. He also defends his opposition to the idea of a European superstate -- "I do not consider the Lisbon Treaty to be a good thing for Europe, for the freedom of Europe, or for the Czech Republic" -- and compares the ideology of environmentalism and global warming alarmism with the ideology of communism.
Finally, he ponders the question of what lessons from history his grandchildren are learning.
Bio
Vaclav Klaus
Vaclav Klaus was born in the Vinohrady district of Prague on July 19, 1941. He spent his childhood and youth in the neighborhood of Tylovo namesti.
He studied at the Prague School of Economics (majoring in the Economics of Foreign Trade and graduating in 1963), and economics became his lifelong specialist field. He took advantage of the relative thaw in Czechoslovak public life at that time to study in Italy (1966) and the USA (1969). As a research worker at the Institute of Economics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, he completed a PhD in Economics in 1968.
In 1970, he was forced to abandon his research career for political reasons and left to work for many years at the Czechoslovak State Bank. He returned to an academic post at the Forecasting Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences in late 1987.
He entered politics immediately after 17th November 1989, but he did not lose his contacts with the world of economics. He continued his lectures and published occasionally and in 1991, he was appointed Assistant Professor of Economics at Charles University. In 1995, he was appointed Professor of Finance at the Prague School of Economics.
Vaclav Klaus started his political career in December 1989, when he became Federal Minister of Finance. In October 1991, he was also appointed Deputy Prime Minister of the Czecho-Slovak Federation. In late 1990, he became Chairman of what was then the strongest political entity in the country - Civic Forum. After its demise in April 1991, he co-founded the Civic Democratic Party, and was its Chairman from the outset until December 2002. He won the parliamentary elections with this party in 1992 and became the Prime Minister of the Czech Republic. It was in this position that he took part in the peaceful division of Czechoslovakia and the foundation of an independent Czech Republic. In 1996, he successfully defended his position as Prime Minister in the elections to the Chamber of Deputies, but he resigned after the break-up of the government coalition in November 1997. After the early elections of 1998, he became the Chairman of the Chamber of Deputies for a four-year term of office.
On February 28, 2003, Vaclav Klaus was elected President of the Czech Republic. Vaclav Klaus is married to economist Livia Klausova and has five grandchildren and two sons: Vaclav is the headmaster of a private grammar school in Prague and Jan works as a financial analyst.
Peter Robinson
Peter M. Robinson is a research fellow at the Hoover Institution, where he writes about business and politics, edits the Hoover Institution's quarterly journal, the Hoover Digest, and hosts Hoover's television program, "Uncommon Knowledge."
Robinson is also the author of three books: How Ronald Reagan Changed My Life; It's My Party: A Republican's Messy Love Affair with the GOP; and the best-selling business book Snapshots from Hell: The Making of an MBA.
President of the Czech Republic Vaclav Klaus compares the ideologies of communism and global warming alarmism.
"They are structurally very similar," says Klaus. "They are against individual freedom. They are in favor of centralistic masterminding of our faiths. They are both very similar in telling us what to do, how to live, how to behave, what to eat..."
Country, central Europe. Area: 30,451 sq mi (78,867 sq km). Population (2009 est.): 10,504,000. Capital: Prague. Czechs make up about nine-tenths of the population; Slovaks and Moravians are the largest minorities. Language: Czech (official). Religion: Christianity (predominantly Roman Catholic, also other Christians, Protestant). Currency: koruna. The landlocked country is dominated by the Bohemian Massif, a ring of mountains rising to 5,256 ft (1,602 m) at Mount Snezka to encircle the Bohemian Plateau. The Morava River valley, known as the Moravian Corridor, separates the Bohemian Massif from the Carpathian Mountains. Woodlands are a characteristic feature of the Czech landscape; most regions have a moderate oceanic climate. The economy, privatized since 1990, is now largely market-oriented. The Czech Republic is a unitary multiparty republic with two legislative houses; its head of state is the president, and the head of government is the prime minister. Until 1918 its history was largely that of Bohemia. In that year the independent republic of Czechoslovakia was born through the union of Bohemia and Moravia with Slovakia. Czechoslovakia came under the domination of the Soviet Union after World War II, and from 1948 to 1989 it was ruled by a communist government. Its growing political liberalization was suppressed by a Soviet invasion in 1968 (seePrague Spring). After 1990, separatist sentiments emerged among the Slovaks, and in 1992 the Czechs and Slovaks agreed to break up their federated state. At midnight on Dec. 31, 1992, Czechoslovakia was peacefully dissolved and replaced by two new countries, the Czech Republic and Slovakia, with the region of Moravia remaining in the former. In 1999 the Czech Republic joined NATO, and in 2004 it became a member of the European Union.
One more psychopath blowing smoke. Environmentalism is not a religion or an ideology but expression of free will in the face of global destruction. And then there's always the BS that we don't want to be told what to do. Excuse me, when your seriously out of line I'm going to tell you so. We're getting tired of these neocons conning us. This guy needs to crawl back under the rock he crawled out from.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelly C Hitchcock
Reagan did defeat communism. You said yourself that one of the reasons it fell was because of external pressure. It was Reagan who brought that pressure to bear. He started an arms race with the USSR which bankrupted it. He also challenged the USSR on moral terms calling it an evil empire and called for Gorbachev to tear down the Berlin wall. Those are fundamental challenges to communism which he made and no one else.
Reagan contributed t the downfall of communism but if I had to compare his actions/motives with someone else, it would be Kaiser Wilhelm II. Both didn't really want war but strongly believed in negotiating from a position of strength with a good potion of manifest destiny thrown into the mix.
With the fate of all of mankind at stake you just don't corner your enemy. This might work in cowboy-movies but when nuclear weapons are involved realpolitik is the name of the game not brinksmanship. Reagan was lucky , Wilhelm II was not. Reagan was a nice man that was way out of his league. Just imagine if Ustinow had lived longer, … Able Archer, and what if they had elected a hardliner to replace Tschernenko?
Communism undermined itself, Reagan and Thatcher were not that important yet rather vocal about it. It was the difference between reality and ideology what mattered, the outside pressure perhaps accelerated the process, but that is about it.
No-one but him made such challenges??????
How moral is it to risk a nuclear holocaust?
Reagan did defeat communism. You said yourself that one of the reasons it fell was because of external pressure. It was Reagan who brought that pressure to bear. He started an arms race with the USSR which bankrupted it. He also challenged the USSR on moral terms calling it an evil empire and called for Gorbachev to tear down the Berlin wall. Those are fundamental challenges to communism which he made and no one else.
Yes, yes we are. I'm not sure why he got elected. He's always been a complete tool. Especially with our previous president Vaclac Havel being so intelligent and internationally involved this guy just doesn't cut it *sigh*
@Ryan Todd :
First of all, I would recommend you look for a video on youtube named "how it all ends" or its prequel which is just 10 minutes named the "The Most Terrifying Video You'll Ever See". The guy over there explains very well who is the authority in every respect : scientific and economic.
Apart from the IPCC, which some people deem untrustworthy since it is a UN body, 2 of the top scientific communities in the world are the AAAS and the NAS. These are the guys you pay for telling you the reality of what's going on out there, and what to expect in the future (even if you don't like the conclusions). Both these organisations have stated the following :
- GW is real and caused by humans
- Its effects are gonna be real bad
- We must take action quickly
The top authority in Economics (sorry! I don't remember the name) states that the worst that could happen on the economy if we take action is a decrease of 3% on GDP growth. Not a reduction ! Just a 3% slowdown on growth.
And the cap that you're talking about is not the only measure that can be taken, but you'll note that even oil industries are calling for it. Improving energy efficiency is a big thing. Cars in USA are even worse efficiency-wise than cars in China (which was still a developing nation last time I checked).
So yes ! taking action will impact some jobs. But it's that or much much worse. It shouldn't take too long to see where's the best bet. If we wait until after we've reached the point of no-return or until we figure out that we don't have enough time anymore... we'll be sorry and losing jobs will be the least of our concerns!
I've heard worse from Klaus, yet what strikes me as rather funny is how he argues. He does ! not ! say global warming is a lie but rather compares how it is being presented and its implications on personal freedom. I can almost wholeheartedly agree with that comparison but it lacks a crucial angle, that question of how meaningful such comparisons are. By Klaus' logic I can compare communism and its effects on personal freedom with what my doctor/GP tells me to eat and how to live and thus by the sheer power of association, lets my doctor look like a freedom hating communist. utter non-sense!
He makes no bones out of his annoyance that an external cause (in this case global warming, formerly Communist doctrine) may dictate the limits of his actions. As the old saying goes, "Your freedom to swing your fist ends where my nose begins." He does not address if Global warming might be that very fist in our collective global nose. This is the all important question, all else is trivial and him not addressing it makes him look like a pouting child.
For the Americans in the audience who regard the EU as an evil institution that takes away the sovereignty of countries. - It is - , the same way the oh so revered and deified drafters of the US constitutions thought it necessary for the common good to expand the powers of a central government as opposed to a lose federation system laid out in the first US constitution "Articles of the Confederation" ...
Very right on many/most esonomic issues; even if for the wrong reasons at times.
Supreme narcissist, and one of the worst nationalists to boot.
Grandpa from hell.
I am a Dane living in the United States. This is an outstanding interview with a brilliant man who's perspective is one that we all can learn. Anyone who doesn't appreciate this clearly needs to brush up on their history. Freedom and free markets are co-dependant. My applaudes to the Heritage Foundation for bringing this enlightened view of todays political currents. The lessons here if learned may overt the upheavel that is coming to the United States where corrupt politicians are sidestepping the Constitution and the population's intent. I recommend this to all freedom loving people.
not everything is designed to make you laugh mr.walsh. these men are discussing events that changed the world. dont fault the speaker for your intellectual flatline__________________________________________ ______________