Conferences Series Events
OCCUPY WALL STREET   |   ELECTION 2012   |   MUSLIM WORLD   |   HEALTHCARE   |   SOCIAL ISSUES   |   FOREIGN POLICY   |   TERRORISM   |   CAPITOL HILL

Gay Marriage: A Debate

More from this partner:

14
Likes
1
Dislikes
RATE
17,841 Views

  • Info
  • Bio
  • Chapters
  • Preview
  • Download
  • More
Please or register to post a comment.

Bearchewtoy75 Avatar
Bearchewtoy75
Posts: 1
Posted: 01.12.10, 01:48 AM
I am so sick and tired of Maggie Gallagher misrepresenting the facts so she can play the victim card! The Methodist Group (notice she didn't say Church) that she and the other members of NOM love to mention did not lose their tax exemption simply because they wouldn't allow a lesbian couple to get married.

First off, it was a civil union ceremony, NOT a wedding. Same sex marriage is not recognized in NJ. A technicality, yes, but it gets better.

Second, this wasn't a church she is talking about. This Methodist group owned several buildings on a camp site, one of which was a beachside pavilion that received a tax exemption from New Jersey. This was not the type of exemption a religious institution gets for being a religious institution. This was given to them by NJ's Dept. of Environmental Protection and one of the stipulations of this exemption was that it be open to the public. In fact, they were originally denied this exemption because NJ didn't think that it would be used enough by the public to warrant the exemption.

Once they did get the exemption, they held many interfaith weddings, and secular events. When a lesbian couple wanted to have their civil union there, they said no and later had their exemption taken away because they violated the state's sexual orientation nondiscrimination policy.

Had the couple wanted to get married in the church and were denied, they would have had no legal recourse!

NJ basically said that if you're going to reap the benefits of being open to the public, that means you have to be open to ALL of the public.

MAGGIE, STOP LYING AND PRETENDING THAT YOU'RE NOT!
rocketdog Avatar
rocketdog
Posts: 211
Posted: 01.11.10, 10:18 AM
Ok, Maggie Gallagher's argument against gay marriage seems to boil down to "if we legalize this, it will be even tougher to be an outspoken homophobe in America than it already is." Well, that's a great argument for denying civil rights to an entire subset of our population, isn't it?

C'mon, people. Have have a heart for those poor, downtrodden homophobes. Let's deny gays their right to get married so future bigots won't get their feelings hurt.
phippsed Avatar
phippsed
Posts: 10
Posted: 01.05.10, 02:59 PM
To me the most important section is the purpose of the state in marriage. If we got rid of marriage as a legal institution this debate would be over. We would no longer need to argue about this because everybody could live their lives as they please. Then people could make their own legal arrangments as for as marriage is concerned and single people would have the same monetary value of benefits from their employers and pay the same percentage of their income in taxes as married people do. This would be a true reflection of what the framers intended. True equality under the law. This has been my position for some time and I don't understand why it doesn't get more steam.
Craigipedia Avatar
Craigipedia
Posts: 7
Posted: 01.05.10, 09:35 AM
The historical ideal form for raising a child wasn't one or two... it was a dozen or more. The arguments in favor of Prop H8 are just so vapid and disoriented.
Craigipedia Avatar
Craigipedia
Posts: 7
Posted: 01.05.10, 09:18 AM
The guy with a goatee is a victim of his own idiotic and off-base generalizations. NOT all cultures have marriage, and NOT all cultures list it between a man and woman or the "two branches of humanity" - whatever the hell that is supposed to mean. He's obviously an evangelical Christian, because he doesn't know anything about anything. His ENTIRE argument in part 4 is completely and irrevocably wrong. If he had ever actually read anything, he would know that. There are cultures with same sex marriage all around the world, but his wonderful Jesus freaks have DESTROYED those cultures over the course of 500 years. I could go on and on, but I'll leave with this point...

"If you go and read the anthropologists"... oh right, THE anthropologists, the unified anthropologist collective, got it. The same anthropologists who show that your religion is an artificially created tradition of nomadic tribesmen, which has absolutely zero historical recognition making it more "factual" than any of the other THOUSANDS of tradition? Thanks guy!
Advertisement
NO ADS + DOWNLOADS + HQ VIEWING
UPGRADE TO FORA.tv PLUS
Advertisement


LAW  |   ECONOMY  |   STEVE JOBS  |   INVESTING  |   MARKETING  |   ENTREPRENEURSHIP  |   RECOVERY  |   ECONOMIC POLICY  |   GLOBALIZATION  |   EMERGING MARKETS
CLIMATE CHANGE  |   ENERGY  |   SUSTAINABILITY  |   ENVIRONMENT  |   TRANSPORTATION  |   POLICY  |   BUILDINGS
OCCUPY WALL STREET  |   ELECTION 2012  |   MUSLIM WORLD  |   HEALTHCARE  |   SOCIAL ISSUES  |   FOREIGN POLICY  |   TERRORISM  |   CAPITOL HILL
SPACE  |   EVOLUTION  |   PHYSICS  |   SOCIAL SCIENCES  |   NATURAL SCIENCES  |   DNA  |   PSYCHOLOGY  |   BIOTECH  |   MEDICINE  |   ANTHROPOLOGY  |   ASTRONOMY
INTERNET  |   NEW MEDIA  |   START-UPS  |   PERSONAL TECHNOLOGY  |   WIRELESS  |   COMPUTING  |   ENGINEERING  |   CEOS
RELIGION  |   GAMING  |   FILM  |   FASHION  |   SEX  |   PHILOSOPHY  |   EDUCATION  |   HISTORY  |   ARTS  |   MUSIC  |   TRAVEL  |   PHOTOGRAPHY
Watch Now