With a recent study showing that up to 97% of Australians aged 16-17 use at least one social networking site, should we be worried? Increasingly children are raised in front of television and computer screens. What are the effects that this can have on brain development? Do websites like Twitter and Facebook contribute to a culture of short term attentiveness?
Baroness Susan Greenfield is a neuroscientist at Oxford University and argues that we should be increasingly wary of how the changing technological environment is affecting the minds of the young.
Bio
Susan Greenfield
Baroness Susan Greenfield, is a British scientist, writer, broadcaster, and member of the House of Lords. Greenfield, whose specialty is the physiology of the brain, has worked to research and bring attention to Parkinson's disease and Alzheimer's disease.
Greenfield is Professor of Synaptic Pharmacology at Lincoln College, Oxford, and Director of the Royal Institution of Great Britain. On February 1, 2006, she was installed as Chancellor of Heriot-Watt University in Edinburgh.
Act or process of knowing. Cognition includes every mental process that may be described as an experience of knowing (including perceiving, recognizing, conceiving, and reasoning), as distinguished from an experience of feeling or of willing. Philosophers have long been interested in the relationship between the knowing mind and external reality; psychologists took up the study of cognition in the 20th century. See alsocognitive psychology; cognitive science; philosophy of mind.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wsoutherland
To say there is no symbolism and content in video games is to say you have a limited understanding of the medium. Neverwinter Nights, Zelda, Assassin's Creed and World of Warcraft are literature.
Real life is boring. To cure this, we read books, watch movies and play video games. We place sentimental value on things to make them worth more than they really are because that is less boring. Some people seek attention, thus the play by play of a cat sneezing. As someone on stage giving a speech, how can you bash someone who is also trying to seek attention? Only your method and ambition are different.
The play by play of a cat sneezing may be for sharing information or thought than for mere attention seeking. some people use a gun for self defence and some use it to kill others or commit robbery, etc., Twitter is used by people for different purpose. Just simplifying it as "attention seeking" isn't really a scienctific or sensible.
BTW, Real life isn't boring for everybody and reading books isn't necessarity for curing that - unless you are referring to Harry Potter.
To say there is no symbolism and content in video games is to say you have a limited understanding of the medium. Neverwinter Nights, Zelda, Assassin's Creed and World of Warcraft are literature.
Real life is boring. To cure this, we read books, watch movies and play video games. We place sentimental value on things to make them worth more than they really are because that is less boring. Some people seek attention, thus the play by play of a cat sneezing. As someone on stage giving a speech, how can you bash someone who is also trying to seek attention? Only your method and ambition are different.
Susan is a wonderful speaker. The narrative is fluid and easy to follow. The theory that nurture has more to do with brain function / development than genetics has been gaining ground. Susan ably demonstrated that. I am not at all surprised by the Piano test. Golfers have been effectively using this – called visualization technique to condition their brains. And I have using this VERY effectively in my public speaking. As for Twitter: religion filled a need (fear, hope, etc.,) in society. I think Twitter is doing something similar.