Angie Coiro - Angie Coiro is host of "LIVE FROM THE LEFT COAST with Angie Coiro" (formerly The Green Show on KKGN in San Francisco. Prior to that, she was the host of Mother Jones Radio on Air America Radio. The program was broadcast every Sunday from 1-2pm EST until it was canceled on December 31, 2007 for financial reasons.
Michael Moore - Michael Moore is an Academy Award-winning American filmmaker, author and liberal political commentator. He is the director and producer of Bowling for Columbine, Fahrenheit 9/11, and Sicko, three of the top five highest-grossing documentaries of all time.
In September 2008, he released his first free movie on the Internet, Slacker Uprising, documenting his personal crusade to encourage more Americans to vote in presidential elections. He has also written and starred in the TV shows "TV Nation" and "The Awful Truth."
Moore is a self-described liberal who has criticized globalization, large corporations, assault weapon ownership, the Iraq War, U.S. President George W. Bush and the American health care system in his written and cinematic works. In 2005, Time magazine named him one of the world's 100 most influential people.
Also in 2005, Moore started the annual Traverse City Film Festival in Traverse City, Michigan. In 2008, he closed his Manhattan office and moved it to Traverse City, where he is working on his new film.
Who are we and why do we behave the way that we do? Writer, director and producer Michael Moore has been trying to answer that question his entire filmmaking career. His latest film, Capitalism: A Love Story, investigates the powerful forces behind the calamitous predicament in which countless Americans are finding themselves: losing their homes, jobs and savings to foot the bill for past spending.
What is the price that America - and the rest of the world - pays for its love of capitalism?
From Middle America to the halls of power in Washington to the global financial epicenter in Manhattan, Moore takes filmgoers into uncharted territory as he tries to get to the heart of the matter.
This guy is a joke. Mr. Moore is simply interested in provocative titles which generate controversy amongst that portion of the American population that feel guilt, ashamed, and embarrassed about their good fortune to be born or living in the United States.
Of course he never offers solutions to any of the issues he dogmatizes. He is out simply to enrich himself, and assuage his personal liberal guilt.
Granted, Mr. Moore is a populist provocateur of the left, the equal of several celebrity media figures on the right.
I don't think it's reasonable to expect media producers to solve social issues such as those highlighted by films such as 'Sicko'.
That's the job of politicians.
Can you imagine Limbaugh, O'Reilly, Hannity and Beck solving issues? Or giving up the bags of money they make exploiting the emotions of their audience?
I don't believe that Moore engages in out and out fabrications. The issues that he exploits are real issues. The suffering Americans that he unearths are not, I believe, liars or actors. Media ought to make us aware of them.
Not all Americans are 'fortunate.' The portion of the American population that does not share in the wealth of this society deserves representation, however distorted.
Moore Says Greedy Media Execs Killed the News Industry
This segment is a perfect example of how Moore over generalizes and worse -- uses "HIS" correlation as if its conclusive cause and effect.
He no doubt has an agenda. However, I enjoy dissent that encourages debate. And, often enough I find his perspective worth investigating.
A great book that would offer a way better perspective on the systemic problem this segment "tries" to approach is "Amusing Ourselves to Death," by Neil Postman. This is a huge cultural issue and I would argue a natural process of the human condition -- not a political issue.
"This guy is a joke. Mr. Moore is simply interested in provocative titles which generate controversy amongst that portion of the American population that feel guilt, ashamed, and embarrassed about their good fortune to be born or living in the United States. "
It has nothing to do about Americans feeling guilty or ashamed about living in America. It is everything to do with how America treats people less able to flourish through no fault of their own when the top earners have nothing on their agenda except making more and more and more at the expense of the poor.
How many other countries in the world would allow such a chasm in the earnings of the top and bottom of the scale.
It's not just newspapers that do this. Look how things have evolved with the internet. Instead of reading the New York Times, we read blogs...or even Twitter (ugh).
NeilW wrote, "How many other countries in the world would allow such a chasm in the earnings of the top and bottom of the scale."
Ummmm, probably close to 99% are significantly worse than the USA. Not saying the States don't have room for improvement but such a statement begs the question, "Have you traveled the globe much?"
Ummmm, probably close to 99% are significantly worse than the USA. Not saying the States don't have room for improvement but such a statement begs the question, "Have you traveled the globe much?"
"Probably"? "close to 99% are significantly worse"? You're talking off the top of your head, and in fact you are way off.
The data are compiled by the UN and the CIA using the so-called Gini Coefficient. The US ranks pretty much in the middle. All of Europe has less disparity, as do Japan (very low), Australia, and Canada. South America has the greatest disparity of any continent, by far.
By the UN computation, the US is tied with Ghana and Turkmenistan, and has slightly more disparity than Russia; slightly less than China. The CIA computation shows us with a lot more disparity than Russia, and ranking just above Kenya, Cameroon, and Ivory Coast.
Incidentally I suspect that traveling the globe - no matter how much - would not be the best way to gauge this kind of data.
Many of the comments posted herein are critical of Moore and without analysis. Characterizing his work as "putrid dogma" is confounding to me. I can understand an adjective like "putrid" from his opposition but why is it "dogma"? Moore has created interest and discussion about some very important subjects. Moreover, while you may not like him or what he says, he is no "joke."