Login with your Facebook Account
To download this program become a
member. JOIN NOW >>
|
Originally Posted by icouce
Forget all the cultural relativism nonsense. It's a public safety issue. I can just see the crime spree total anonymity will spur. Carry a shotgun into a bank or liquor store and no one would know whom to look for; security cameras would be useless. Later they'd find a burka laying in the alley. (Yes; only an imbecile would think only law abiding women would wear a burka.)
Not to mention driving; the hijab is not as occlusive, but can you imagine trying to drive with a burka on? It would make cell phone use while driving look down right safe! |
|
Originally Posted by John Thomson
Posetti just doesn't get it. She seems to regard the burka as a fashion choice and not a tool of oppression. Clearly the whole concept of the burka says far more about the men who condone it than the women who are subjected to it.
|
|
John, you are maing a big mistake in thinking like that. May be it's because what you know as Islam was not what Islam is. Quote:
[quoteCultural sensitivity and respect? Then why are we the only ones required to be respectful? Why can't those who come here be respectful towards us and our way of life which is presumably what makes this country so attractive to begin with? Those who come here and make demands are not only impolite, or ungrateful, but outright offensive. It is clear though that there is a monopoly on the right to be offended. If people feel Australia is too liberal and indecent, there are any number of other countries where they can settle and fit right in as is. I fail to see why we accept people coming from war torn countries where they claim they can no longer live safely, and then allow them to set about turning this country into the very same shit fight they just left! To all those agenda pushing apologists who campaign for the rights of muslims to continue their primitive and destructive traditions, I would suggest that if that way of life is so appealing to you, perhaps you should move over there. Immerse yourself in it. You have the right, I suppose, to ensure your daughter's lives begin with clitorodectomy and forced marriage, and end with honour killing. But not in this country. I guess those who claim that banning the burka would be un-Australian also regard banning paedophilia as un-Australian. After all, it's culturally acceptable in Islam to marry off your 9 year old daughter to some filthy, lecherous, middle aged uncle. Wonderful. We need to stop being cowardly hypocrites and start making some demands of our own. Our rights to equality and freedom are clearly undermined by Islam. Islam, and not just the burka, should be banned in Australia. |
|
Originally Posted by testtt
I will make a number of points just as food for thought although there is a lot to say about this issue. First, I think the fact that none of the panellists actually wore ‘niqab’, or even ‘hijab’ for that matter shows exactly how balanced the debate was.
|
| That is, there was no representative of people who wear niqab or even hijab. The only Muslim woman on the panel took particular interest in making fun of not just niqab but even hijab on a number of occasions (however subtle it might have been). She also tried to justify the wearing of niqab by saying that it protected the identity of prostitutes! |
| Secondly, Virginia claimed that the reason for wearing the niqab had to do with trust, whether a society that does not trust their men with women or a society that does not trust their women (whatever she means by that as she did not explain it). |
| For a person who has lived in the West and was brought up in Western society, I can tell you that I certainly have a lot more trust in regards to religious Muslim men than Australian men. |
|
The fact of the matter is that Australian men cannot be trusted even more so than Muslim men because of the fact that the culture continuously glorifies the objectification of women as sexual toys. However, the niqab and the hijab are not about not trusting men or women although that does have an indirect role in it. It is about both men and women keeping themselves decent and away from sexual desires outside of marriage. Of course, whether or not I am decent does not guarantee that the person walking down the street looking at me is also decent. Thirdly, women in the west simply do not have a choice as much as they like to think they do. Muslim women who wear a hijjab or a niqab make the decision to cover their body from all men except close relations. So they wake up in the morning before going out put on their full body covering (whether revealing the face or not) do what they need to do outside and come back home change into a clothing of their choice for inside of the house. Hence, if they are married they might make the choice to put on makeup and lingerie for their husband. However, Virginia feels compelled to wake up in the morning put on makeup and a set of clothing that whether she likes it or not has sexual overtones to it (low-cut top, etc.) for men who are not related to her and in most cases does not put on anything for her husband when coming back home. So she is compelled by a male dominated society to present herself sexually to all the men outside of the house. Finally, a quick point. Julie made a point about Anglican Church (which has a much more liberal outlook that, for example, the Catholic Church) not allowing women ordination. This is while in Islam women are allowed to become theologians. Should we force the Anglican Church to ordain women?! |
|
Originally Posted by Meredith Nichols
I really enjoyed the points of Virginia Hausegger, however, I'm am not completely convinced that banning the Burka is the most effective way to stop the subjugation of women under the given circumstances.
|
|
Originally Posted by tamkin
Bravo Virginia Hausegger!
|


