Conferences Series Events
SPACE   |   EVOLUTION   |   PHYSICS   |   SOCIAL SCIENCES   |   NATURAL SCIENCES   |   DNA   |   PSYCHOLOGY   |   BIOTECH   |   MEDICINE   |   ANTHROPOLOGY   |   ASTRONOMY
INTERNET   |   NEW MEDIA   |   START-UPS   |   PERSONAL TECHNOLOGY   |   WIRELESS   |   COMPUTING   |   ENGINEERING   |   CEOS
RELIGION   |   GAMING   |   FILM   |   FASHION   |   SEX   |   PHILOSOPHY   |   EDUCATION   |   HISTORY   |   ARTS   |   MUSIC   |   TRAVEL   |   PHOTOGRAPHY
Watch Now

Chevron & Sierra Club: Drilling for Common Ground

3
Likes
0
Dislikes
RATE
3,945 Views

  • Info
  • Bio
  • Chapters
  • Highlights
  • Transcript
  • Download
  • More
Please or register to post a comment.

amzoil Avatar
amzoil
Posts: 1
Posted: 02.09.11, 10:55 AM
I like the point that O'Riley made about the Ecuadorian government making 72 billion dollars from the Texaco drilling contract. Everyone loves to blame the corporations. But where is Ecuador's government in all of this? Don't they bear the responsibility for the people of Ecuador? That government could have done alot for it's people with 72 billion dollars.
I have personally drilled for oil in Africa, Indonesia, Alaska, Louisiana, and many other places. What I have have seen, with my own eyes, is that communities where oil companies operate have a higher standard of living. The energy industry creates jobs in places that would otherwise be very poor. I have also seen very greedy and corrupt governments allow their people to live in filth while they get rich off oil revenues. Corporations' goals are obvious; they want to turn a profit, and it's in their interest to make that profit in a responsible way. In my very real and personal experiences drilling around the world, governments are the problem...consistently.
chefjeremy Avatar
chefjeremy
Posts: 4
Posted: 05.06.10, 05:16 AM
i could be wrong, but doesnt natural gas give less BTUs than petrolium? Wouldnt have to use more to get the same result? I feel that all new tectnology should be use so there would be more insentive to improve them. diversity is important for change. Also, does plant life improve carbon levels?
4TimesAYear Avatar
4TimesAYear
Posts: 45
Posted: 09.03.09, 12:30 AM
Burning biofuels is no different than burning coal. They're both carbon - the only difference is one is not fossilized. Reality bites.
4TimesAYear Avatar
4TimesAYear
Posts: 45
Posted: 09.03.09, 12:23 AM
The earth does not have a fever. There is no meaningful "global average temperature" Our planet is wonderfully balanced. While it's summer in one hemisphere, it's winter in the other. +100 degrees in Chicago will not melt ice where it's -100. It's time to get back to common sense.
tsmitheugene503 Avatar
tsmitheugene503
Posts: 23
Posted: 06.25.09, 12:59 PM
Nice points made by both. Pope was slightly obnoxious at times but overall, good debate.
Advertisement
NO ADS + DOWNLOADS + HQ VIEWING
UPGRADE TO FORA.tv PLUS
Advertisement