Conferences Series Events
SPACE   |   EVOLUTION   |   PHYSICS   |   SOCIAL SCIENCES   |   NATURAL SCIENCES   |   DNA   |   PSYCHOLOGY   |   BIOTECH   |   MEDICINE   |   ANTHROPOLOGY   |   ASTRONOMY
INTERNET   |   NEW MEDIA   |   START-UPS   |   PERSONAL TECHNOLOGY   |   WIRELESS   |   COMPUTING   |   ENGINEERING   |   CEOS
RELIGION   |   GAMING   |   FILM   |   FASHION   |   SEX   |   PHILOSOPHY   |   EDUCATION   |   HISTORY   |   ARTS   |   MUSIC   |   TRAVEL   |   PHOTOGRAPHY
Live Now
Watch Now

John Adams: Composing an American Life

3
Likes
0
Dislikes
RATE
23,024 Views

  • Info
  • Bio
  • Chapters
  • Highlights
  • Transcript
  • Download
  • More
Please or register to post a comment.

bailhe Avatar
bailhe
Posts: 1
Posted: 06.04.10, 06:58 PM
I'm a huge fan, loved his book, have about everything he's released, etc. I wish, however, someone had asked him to explain the distinction he seems to make between the artistic significance of pop culture and what he describes as his separate culture of serious art. There is certainly a great mass of daft, senseless -- even wretched output in pop culture, but I think there is likely a similar -- if not higher --percentage of serious art with equal failings. He intimates that high art is somehow more intellectual, contains more fascinating ideas, or something, but I can't understand that. Although literati typically have better vocabularies than gliterati, it seems to me their art -- the work that is meaningful and valuable to us -- talks about the same thing: the full experience of being a human being.
eglasgow Avatar
eglasgow
Posts: 9
Posted: 06.05.09, 03:32 PM
He comes off as a divisive elitist when he says something along the lines of "They want to know what we're thinking," referring to non-intellectuals vs. intellectuals. There is not a dividing line, as he seems to suggest, between these two groups.
Advertisement
NO ADS + DOWNLOADS + HQ VIEWING
UPGRADE TO FORA.tv PLUS
Advertisement