Language can inspire and move people. But it can also deceive and deflect. Our new president has often been praised for his ability to use language, while our former president was accused by opponents of "linguistic trickery."
Linguistic Professor Geoffrey Nunberg takes a closer look at our nation's political and social discourse over the past several years, revealing what it says about us.
Bio
Geoffrey Nunberg
Geoffrey Nunberg is an adjunct full professor at U.C. Berkeley's School of Information. He is also a researcher at the Center for the Study of Language and Information at Stanford University, and a consulting professor in the Stanford Department of Linguistics. His linguistics research includes work in semantics and pragmatics, text classification, and written-language structure, and he also works and writes on the social and cultural implications of digital technologies.
Mr. Nunberg does a feature on language on the NPR show "Fresh Air" and has written numerous commentaries on language for the Sunday New York Times Week in Review, as well as for other periodicals. He’s also contributed occasional "letters from America" to the BBC4 series "State of the Union" and was the former chair of the usage panel of the American Heritage Dictionary.
The full title of his most recent book is Talking Right: How Conservatives Turned Liberalism into a Tax-Raising, Latte-Drinking, Sushi-Eating, Volvo-Driving, New York Times-reading, Body-Piercing, Hollywood-Loving, Left-Wing Freak Show.
Study of meaning, one of the major areas of linguistic study (seelinguistics). Linguists have approached it in a variety of ways. Members of the school of interpretive semantics study the structures of language independent of their conditions of use. In contrast, the advocates of generative semantics insist that the meaning of sentences is a function of their use. Still another group maintains that semantics will not advance until theorists take into account the psychological questions of how people form concepts and how these relate to word meanings.
In my opinion the current world wide recession that we are now experiencing and the invasion of Iraq are very much the result of the policies and philosophy of right wing politics which the ground work was laid down by Ronald Reagan by his approach to politics, such as “the problem is government”, apparently few people was giving much thought that the government is the only governing body with the authority to keep capitalism in check.
Then there's the lead up to the invasion of Iraq with Bush's statements of “ you are either with us or you are against us” which compelled the spineless democrats to buckle under, knowing that the right is mean and nasty and so were more concerned about their political careers due to the consequences of opposing, or even questioning them, than for the welfare of the country. Even the, so called liberal media buckled under without even questioning the rhetoric. However, I have loads of praises for Frontline for their investigative reports, though apparently, few were listening.
Then there's the concept of lower taxes, which sounds like a good thing, but the agenda was really to deregulate and de-fund regulatory agencies that allowed the capitalist, of all sorts, to run amok
I disagree with Mr. Nunberg in his assessment that the right is finished, being that they are very good at using spin to appeal to the common people with catch phrases to address the lowest most common denominator and will, without a doubt in my opinion, will have no problem in conjuring up wedge issues and will be back in power again sooner or later, heaven help us.
Even now the right dominates the general media on the TV, radio and the internet with their hate mongering, misleading and spinning propaganda that would make Goebbels proud.