Identified as "one of the ten most important people in the media that nobody's ever met," Andrew Breitbart details why leftward-leaning Hollywood is dangerous for America and why the people who run it are "uninteresting," "vitriolic," and "vicious."
Segueing from Hollywood to the Internet, Breitbart explores why the right dominates talk radio and the left seems to do better on the Internet and how the decline of print media is changing the nature of the national political conversation.
Bio
Andrew Breitbart
Andrew Breitbart is an American publisher, commentator for the Washington Times, author, an occasional guest commentator on various news programs who has served as an editor for the Drudge Report website. He was a researcher for Arianna Huffington, and helped launch her website, The Huffington Post.
He currently runs his own news aggregation site, Breitbart.com, and five other websites: Breitbart.tv, Big Hollywood, Big Government, Big Journalism, and Big Peace.
He is the author of Hollywood, Interrupted: Insanity Chic in Babylon -- The Case Against Celebrity.
Peter Robinson
Peter M. Robinson is a research fellow at the Hoover Institution, where he writes about business and politics, edits the Hoover Institution's quarterly journal, the Hoover Digest, and hosts Hoover's television program, "Uncommon Knowledge."
Robinson is also the author of three books: How Ronald Reagan Changed My Life; It's My Party: A Republican's Messy Love Affair with the GOP; and the best-selling business book Snapshots from Hell: The Making of an MBA.
I don't agree with your 'simple minded assessment'. It is patently true that the left in Hollywood has a lock on the culture and that there is almost a McCarthyism black list for anyone who does not tow the leftist party line in public. Bretbart is correct.
On other matters: SwampFoxAnalyst your so called analysis is wrong. Most intellectuals in France have definitely not attended the same Grande Ecoles that the French civil servants have attended. Foucault and Derida for example were not products of the elite system. Nor, in earlier times was Sartre or de Beauvoir. Breitbart's point holds.
Few celebrities in the US have even a modicum of education; few indeed have completed their schooling and by luck (and indeed sometimes by acting skill) they, like Peter Pan, are able never to grow up and face the responsibilities of the world. They float (as many leftists do) in an perpetual adolescent sea without responsibilities - money and fame does that to a person.
This video is simple minded right wing talking points and argument framing to mislead in misinform run amok. I'm surprised Fora.tv thought it merited a place where standards are normally far higher.
I find it laughable that he characterizes actors as fearing people of intellect so that they choose to associate with the elite of France. The elite of France are, almost to a person, the graduates of the Grandes écoles. The students admitted to these schools are the intellectual elite of France. There are no French equivalents to George W. Bush at Yale, daddy can't buy admission into an elite school. In France, if you can't outscore the competition, you don't get in. Of course, daddy can buy you a tutor, but you still have to perform well on the entrance examinations. France is as close to a meritocracy of any place that I know. Brieitbart is displaying the behavior that he lambasts in Hollywood.