occupy wall street   |   Election 2012   |   Muslim World   |   Healthcare   |   Social Issues   |   Foreign Policy   |   Terrorism   |   Capitol Hill

Corporate Responsibility and Complicity

More videos from this partner:

12
Likes
0
Dislikes
RATE
57,851 Views

  • Info
  • Bio
  • Chapters
  • Preview
  • Download
  • Zoom In
Advertisement
There are 6 comments on this program

Please or register to post a comment.
Previous FORAtv comments:
BlueBerry Pick'n Avatar
BlueBerry Pick'n
Posted: 07.30.09, 04:36 PM
wait a minute: doesn't Google collaborate aka 'conspire' with the corporate-enabling, totalitarian Chinese government to disappear & jail social dissidents ? ...you know, much like the US was happy to torture juvenile * suspected* offenders & Uyghur / ئۇيغۇر / 维吾尔 people in GITMO ? pardon me if I'm skeptical about the Real-World institutional application ethics, or even Corporate Responsibility and Complicity chez Google ...it smells too much like the AT&T & ilk's warrant-less wiretapping deal Sorry, but I'm horrified that G8 nations no longer respect human rights off-shore, much less protect the privacy & human rights of domestic & NATO nations' Peoples... I'd respect Google representatives' learned opinions if I knew they were in practise Spread Love, ... BlueBerry Pick'n can be found @ The Jeff Farias Show streams FREE & LIVE Mon-Fri, 6-9pmEDT "We, two, form a Multitude " - Ovid. " Violence can only be concealed by a Lie, & the Lie can only be maintained by Violence. " ... " Any man, who has once proclaimed Violence as his Method, is inevitably forced to take the Lie as his Principle " – Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn. Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. " - Voltaire. " Silent Freedom is Freedom Silenced "
theoriginaldrifter Avatar
theoriginaldrifter
Posted: 06.05.09, 02:25 PM
True, we would be able to stop people from over spamming sites but at the same time, but then the US would then be able to even more efficiently track what exactly you are doing. Sites like google and yahoo are bound by their user vow/contract that they will not divulge in private information but if the government was the one that was controlling it, what would stop them from saying that you are a threat to society and have them bust into your home? The government is already implementing cameras that take photos of cars' license plates which is supposed to be used for speed limit purposes but they could easily track down which routes you have been taking and can watch your every move. Do you really think that is a good idea? But I agree with sunoveristambul. Freedom is speech is priority number one. Who is to say that you are allowed to play God of the internets?
felipesuarez Avatar
felipesuarez
Posted: 05.28.09, 11:11 PM
censorship steps cannot be taken. its like censoring phone conversations. monitor but not censor
sunoveristambul Avatar
sunoveristambul
Posted: 05.28.09, 11:02 PM
I believe the ALL forms of internet use are valid. It seems obvious that the allowance clause for anything to do with the ending of "--philia" in the proposed legislation is for "pedophilia". This is sickening. BUT If censorship steps are taken.... WHO will decide what should be on the internet. Information has always been controlled.. revolutions coming about with the invention of the printing press.. freedom to expess ALL INFORMATION and opinions is a must. But the resistriction of information will ALWAYS be taken by the elitist controling powers.
Gabriel Michas Avatar
Gabriel Michas
Posted: 05.28.09, 04:27 PM
As we move forward as a society, we advance our communications in a more transparent and intangible form of medium. First the book, then the radio, then the tv, then the mobile and so on. Technology communications will be more miniaturized and less tangible in control mannered by distance as well. This kind of trend may also arise a lot of skepticism about the person recognition identity presence and interaction. This intangibility sense in interaction by no way should be interpreted and be used as a camouflage mandate. When I am writing something I am writing it from me to you, I mean even as a book to say or in a blog to print. It is my written speech and for this I am responsible for, so I put my name in, the real one. This is an act of freedom of speech and act of trust of each other, in public. And by this we honor the other person we attempt to talk to and we honor the dialogue and our democracy. Always safer to be yourself. Thank you.
Gnarlodious Avatar
Gnarlodious
Posted: 05.28.09, 02:48 PM
I'm all FOR that idea! I am sick and tired of anonymous posters ruining discussions and hiding behind dynamic IP addresses. If I had my way, all access points (modems) would have a static IP address.
Advertisement

Advertisement
Internet  |   New Media  |   Start-Ups  |   Personal Technology  |   Wireless  |   Computing  |   Engineering  |   CEOs
Religion  |   Gaming  |   Film  |   Fashion  |   Sex  |   Philosophy  |   Education  |   History  |   Arts  |   Music  |   Travel  |   Photography
occupy wall street  |   Election 2012  |   Muslim World  |   Healthcare  |   Social Issues  |   Foreign Policy  |   Terrorism  |   Capitol Hill
Law  |   Economy  |   steve jobs  |   Investing  |   Marketing  |   Entrepreneurship  |   Recovery  |   Economic Policy  |   Globalization  |   Emerging Markets
Climate Change  |   Energy  |   Sustainability  |   Environment  |   Transportation  |   Policy  |   Buildings
Space  |   Evolution  |   Physics  |   Social Sciences  |   Natural Sciences  |   DNA  |   Psychology  |   Biotech  |   Medicine  |   Anthropology  |   Astronomy
Watch Now
Watch Now