Conferences Series Events
SPACE   |   EVOLUTION   |   PHYSICS   |   SOCIAL SCIENCES   |   NATURAL SCIENCES   |   DNA   |   PSYCHOLOGY   |   BIOTECH   |   MEDICINE   |   ANTHROPOLOGY   |   ASTRONOMY
INTERNET   |   NEW MEDIA   |   START-UPS   |   PERSONAL TECHNOLOGY   |   WIRELESS   |   COMPUTING   |   ENGINEERING   |   CEOS
RELIGION   |   GAMING   |   FILM   |   FASHION   |   SEX   |   PHILOSOPHY   |   EDUCATION   |   HISTORY   |   ARTS   |   MUSIC   |   TRAVEL   |   PHOTOGRAPHY
Watch Now
4
Likes
0
Dislikes
RATE
23,650 Views

  • Info
  • Bio
  • Chapters
  • Highlights
  • Transcript
  • Download
  • More
Please or register to post a comment.

Rdallas1 Avatar
Rdallas1
Posts: 44
Posted: 06.10.09, 11:36 AM
heybd, I completely agree with you that nothing negative can come from taking better care of the world we live in. Obviously, continuous CO2 emissions can not be good for our environment. For those of you that question the damage CO2 emissions and global warming, it may be beneficial to also watch this video http://fora.tv/2009/05/06/Bill_McKib...r_in_the_World.
heybd Avatar
heybd
Posts: 60
Posted: 05.22.09, 11:08 AM
To those who say global warming is not established fact, even if that is so, that should not abdicate our responsibility to be good stewards of the environment in which we live and on which we depend. What positive effects are there from man-made pollution and CO2 emissions? What negative effects are there for reducing those products?

Have you ever gone camping or hiking and been told to leave nature as you found it? I think that is an admirable goal for humanity. To minimize our ecological footprint can only benefit us in the long run. We still don't know how our activities impact the earth, so we should err on the side of caution lest we pollute ourselves out of a home.
4TimesAYear Avatar
4TimesAYear
Posts: 45
Posted: 04.26.09, 12:22 AM
How on earth is taking an ice-breaking ship up there going to help matters? How thick is the ice you are breaking up? How do you know that eco-tourism isn't a part of the problem?
4TimesAYear Avatar
4TimesAYear
Posts: 45
Posted: 04.26.09, 12:11 AM
So what if the tree line moves north; it's been there before. If (big "if") it happens the birds will adapt.
Aussie Hegemon Avatar
Aussie Hegemon
Posts: 3
Posted: 04.24.09, 07:45 AM
No question: too many indicators in the data conflict w/ most alarmist prognostications about warming in the earth's atmosphere. I have yet to hear a cogent explanation for why it is that, according to ALL satellite atmospheric measurements, the earth has not warmed since 2001 - and even cooled slightly in 2008 - IF it's true that we're in some cataclysmic struggle to keep the earth from overheating.

That fact - that the earth hasn't warmed since 01 - is not one that gets much attention in the media.

But I can promise you this - the discourse is changing, the "consensus" is breaking, it isn't publicly visible right now but it will be before long.
RoyalWe Avatar
RoyalWe
Posts: 50
Posted: 04.24.09, 07:11 AM
Yeah except that according to the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research report prepared for a recent meeting of Antarctic Treaty nations in Washington noted the South Pole had shown "significant cooling in recent decades." And according to Australia Antarctic Division glaciology program head Ian Allison said sea ice losses in west Antarctica over the past 30 years had been more than offset by increases in the Ross Sea region, just one sector of east Antarctica.

"Sea ice conditions have remained stable in Antarctica generally," Allison said.

But let's not let these statements based on objective measurements of ice mass in Antarctica muddle the political agenda, eh?
Advertisement
NO ADS + DOWNLOADS + HQ VIEWING
UPGRADE TO FORA.tv PLUS
Advertisement