Conferences Series Events
SPACE   |   EVOLUTION   |   PHYSICS   |   SOCIAL SCIENCES   |   NATURAL SCIENCES   |   DNA   |   PSYCHOLOGY   |   BIOTECH   |   MEDICINE   |   ANTHROPOLOGY   |   ASTRONOMY
INTERNET   |   NEW MEDIA   |   START-UPS   |   PERSONAL TECHNOLOGY   |   WIRELESS   |   COMPUTING   |   ENGINEERING   |   CEOS
RELIGION   |   GAMING   |   FILM   |   FASHION   |   SEX   |   PHILOSOPHY   |   EDUCATION   |   HISTORY   |   ARTS   |   MUSIC   |   TRAVEL   |   PHOTOGRAPHY
Watch Now

Infrastructure Debate: Policy Challenges Facing Nation

9
Likes
0
Dislikes
RATE
29,664 Views

  • Info
  • Bio
  • Chapters
  • Highlights
  • Transcript
  • Download
  • More
Please or register to post a comment.

Shaka Avatar
Shaka
Posts: 1
Posted: 03.02.09, 05:29 PM
Hubbert: Most United States passenger trains operate around 59mph and top out at 90mph with few exceptions like the Acela which has a 150mph train service that operates only in the NE. The proposed increase from 59mph to the CA proposed 220mph train would make travel by train much more convient and efficent then it is currently. As far as charging more than x amount to pay for it I'm not sure you thought that through. The benefits to the business sector have to be taken in to account since they could also move freight much faster. Not to mention how much do you pay daily to drive on the roads? Outside of gas, car maintence, insurance chances are you don't pay a toll to drive on the roads with few exceptions. So should we stop maintaining roads since your not paying for them directly with a ticket every day? The highway system and roads throughout the country provide a benefit to citizens, consumers, suppliers, gov't and should be maintained and upgraded. The same argument can be applied here, high-speed rail would increase productivity for business that ship freight, reduce traffic congestion on the highways and in theory be a more "green" approach to travel. I'm not going to write a research paper here, but try to understand a bit more about the economy and the government as a whole before you say its stupid.
heybd Avatar
heybd
Posts: 60
Posted: 03.02.09, 04:27 PM
Man, if they could pull off high speed rail that would be so cool. The only problem is it'll be 30 years before it's done and it will likely have all kinds of problems because special interests will force all kinds of compromises. But my fingers are crossed.
hubbert Avatar
hubbert
Posts: 1
Posted: 03.01.09, 03:55 PM
Dear Governor of CA,
we appreciate your comments on infrastructure. taking rail instead of flying 300 mi.
you seem to no remember we have the best highway system in the world, people drive.
let's say we do as you suggest, update the rail system at a cost of (lets guess) 100 Million. and what exactly is gained? someone takes a train, then what? a taxi, across LA or San Fran? and what will the ticket cost? today that little plane ride is $100, what might the train ticket cost? if it's less than $100, then how do we pay for the rail improvements? if it's more than $100, will anyone use it and then how do we pay for the rail improvements.
not too bright.
Rather, can we concentrate on real problems? like how to keep CA from becoming bankrupt? and becoming more of a burden on the national economy than it already is?
pick the right battles, that's presumably why you were elected, sir.
Advertisement
NO ADS + DOWNLOADS + HQ VIEWING
UPGRADE TO FORA.tv PLUS
Advertisement