Conferences Series Events
SPACE   |   EVOLUTION   |   PHYSICS   |   SOCIAL SCIENCES   |   NATURAL SCIENCES   |   DNA   |   PSYCHOLOGY   |   BIOTECH   |   MEDICINE   |   ANTHROPOLOGY   |   ASTRONOMY
INTERNET   |   NEW MEDIA   |   START-UPS   |   PERSONAL TECHNOLOGY   |   WIRELESS   |   COMPUTING   |   ENGINEERING   |   CEOS
RELIGION   |   GAMING   |   FILM   |   FASHION   |   SEX   |   PHILOSOPHY   |   EDUCATION   |   HISTORY   |   ARTS   |   MUSIC   |   TRAVEL   |   PHOTOGRAPHY
Live Now
Watch Now

Robert Shiller: How Animal Spirits Drive the Economy

19
Likes
0
Dislikes
RATE
141,314 Views

  • Info
  • Bio
  • Chapters
  • Highlights
  • Transcript
  • Download
  • More
Please or register to post a comment.

keenhumor Avatar
keenhumor
Posts: 6
Posted: 06.20.10, 10:25 PM
Well, they are looking at the real world. At least these economists are. After the Great Depression, that's exactly what happened: The U.S. came to be the utmost power in manufacturing around the world, and the richest country --as it still stands today (in a way). During the 80's that people started learning finance; exactly according to Shiller, they 'forgot' about the crisis and went to create a new one!
marting Avatar
marting
Posts: 1
Posted: 02.19.10, 07:55 PM
They don't address the basic problem: During the bubbles there was a tremendous amount of malinvestments and those need to be corrected. There are too many people learning MBAs, working in real estate, working in sales and too few study engineering, nursing. Why? Because during the bubbles people got false signals that the former group of professions were the way to get rich quick. The way to fix it is creating unemployment and force these people to do something useful that contribute to society. The government programs aim to stop this.

These economist all look at graphs and aggregate numbers and not at what is happening in the real world.
Puisk Avatar
Puisk
Posts: 1
Posted: 10.21.09, 11:57 PM
I can not watach the VDO.
Sejong Avatar
Sejong
Posts: 4
Posted: 07.05.09, 04:00 PM
I think the point that Schiller is making is that modern economic theory assumes that people always act rationally. In fact, we don't always act rationally because we are humans, not computers. Sometimes emotions like exuberance or fear (or other "animalistic" emotions) affect the decision-making process. Economic models don't account for this fact, and are therefore too simple to rely without discretion.
bthamm Avatar
bthamm
Posts: 1
Posted: 03.26.09, 12:19 PM
Behavioral Economics and systemic thinking has become a more pervasive topic, but the prevailing economic theory has been the idea that people will respond solely to incentives and disincentives.
m0nkeybl1tz Avatar
m0nkeybl1tz
Posts: 9
Posted: 03.09.09, 05:38 PM
Interesting. I didn't realize the prevailing idea in economics is that it's unaffected by human behavior. Shiller's arguments went way the hell over my head, but DeLong made quite a good case. Yes, it's the market's goal to allocate capital, but it does it so by influencing people's investment habits. And, in a perfect world, people would invest where the market wants them too. But guess what? The market wants investing now, and nobody's doing it. Why? Because they're scared. Score one for psychology.
Advertisement
NO ADS + DOWNLOADS + HQ VIEWING
UPGRADE TO FORA.tv PLUS
Advertisement