In the wake of Obama's call for change, Matt Miller has been a longtime advocate for re-evaluating our government's foundation to ensure a safe and secure future for all Americans.
He discusses the American attitude of entitlement and excess and says it has led us down the path to financial ruin and threatened our viability as the world leader.
Miller outlines how to overcome these "dead ideas" to help our nation and its people flourish.
He served as an aide to President Clinton and is trusted on both sides of the aisle as a visionary with solutions.
Bio
Matt Miller
Matthew Miller is an American journalist, and senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, a monthly columnist for Fortune, regular contributor to The New York Times Magazine and The Atlantic Monthly, and author of The Two Percent Solution.
He also appears regularly on CNN and MSNBC. He previously served as a corporate consultant and as an advisor to the Office of Management and Budget in the Clinton administration. Miller is a senior advisor to global management consulting firm McKinsey & Company and to the firm's in-house economics think-tank McKinsey Global Institute.
Miller supports universal health insurance, increased education spending, school vouchers and other goals detailed in his book. He was also a supporter of the 2003 invasion of Iraq, and remains supportive of the Iraq War.
He is moderator and co-host of the nationally syndicated public radio program Left, Right & Center, representing the center.
Many folks seemed to be bothered by Miller's self-interested and capitalistic promotion of his book. Is this the contradiction that irritates people? I recommend we let the market sort this kind of thing out.
I enjoyed M. Miller's anaysis and found it stimulating. Its obvious that the success of Bill Clinton was due to thinking like Matt Miller is supporting. This lecture stood on its own it was not a teaser,contraction or an empty book promotion but a cogent presentation by a bright stimulating intellectual.
And so he is a good public speaker and wrote a book. I’m sure he is full of contradictions. I wouldn’t know.
I think he does, however, identify that no system is perfect. The contradictions arise when you analyse history. History can be defined as a series of social events therefore history never exactly repeats itself in the same exact way. It repeats itself but the causality is always different and unpredictable. It is too easy to look to historic events and facts to support your premises. It may provide us with some insight but it is not a reliable way of forecasting.
I believe what he really wanted to say is that when you ignore the inevitable (or reality) bad things will and must happen (contradictions of reality) and the individual (or society in general) should be accountable and will eventually have a personal interest to resolve these issues. Nobody's ideas are perfect, they can only be generally accepted at best but we should always consider every idea wrong and look for ways of proving them so.
I watched the first half-hour, in which he outlines his 'dead ideas'.
This is nothing more than book promotion, to appeal to the lowest common denominator statists.
He contradicts himself at every turn, and appears to have little understanding of cause-effect relationships in the economy. He baselessly links every problem to his idea of free individuals not knowing what is best for themselves.
I watched the first half-hour, in which he outlines his 'dead ideas'.
This is nothing more than book promotion, to appeal to the lowest common denominator statists.
He contradicts himself at every turn, and appears to have little understanding of cause-effect relationships in the economy. He baselessly links every problem to free individuals not knowing what is best for themselves.