FORA.tv

The Smart Network

Dacher Keltner in Conversation

Los Angeles Public Library and W. W. Norton
Rate It
30,448 Views
  • Info
  • Bio
  • Full Program
  • Highlights
  • Transcript
  • Download
  • More
rocketdog Avatar
rocketdog
Posts: 190
Posted: 02.19.09, 03:36 PM
Are we not men?
__________________
But words - words are not enough! - Klaus Kinski
Permalink
rocketdog Avatar
rocketdog
Posts: 190
Posted: 02.20.09, 12:07 PM
Speaking of devo, here's something interesting I found out a while ago: the idea of "de-evolution" is a biological fallacy. The de-evo myth is based on the assumption that evolution is meant to occur in a positive, singular direction, and any perceived "regression" to previously held ("less-developed") evolutionary traits run counter to that line of progress and therefore are a Bad Thing. In fact, changes that occur due to evolution are just that -- adaptations due to environmental or other circumstance, and nothing more. It's certainly possible, if not highly likely, that technology is affecting our evolutionary development as a species, but from a strictly objective, biological point-of-view, it's a fallacy to assume those changes are negative because some of them can be viewed from our current situation as less "complex."

I haven't figured out how to link in this version of the comment box, but the Wikipedia article on biological devolution is pretty good: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_devolution
__________________
But words - words are not enough! - Klaus Kinski
Permalink
amoffat Avatar
amoffat
Posts: 0
Posted: 02.21.09, 04:39 AM
it's important to understand that using an abstract layer of communication (tech), helps evolve certain "blind" intuitions. where once we could infer the emotions of someone by their faces and gestures, now we are learning to infer them from subtleties such as word usage, the tone of responses, and timing...all 3 of these blind to actual "physical" cues.

i would argue that tech is evolving our senses of perception as we grapple with understanding context in an environment where context is not explicit.
Permalink
Chrissy Michelle Strawn Avatar
Chrissy Michelle Strawn
Posts: 1
Posted: 03.21.09, 11:52 PM
That was a very good question. I reluctantly have to agree that burying ones face in a cell phone and texting all the time may not be a good thing for the human condition. But is that all that these people do? I think not. The same question could be asked about video games. But I think this question is pointed in the wrong direction. Are these people who use these devices constantly becoming addicted? That people can get so enured by such simple things such as these devices, alcohol, and drugs is the tragedy.
Permalink
Please log in or register to post a comment.
Advertisement

Related Programs

Mastering Attention to Transform Experience Mastering Attention to Transform Experience
01:12:26 min | 15,361 Views
Glenn Wilson: The Power of Music Glenn Wilson: The Power of Music
00:55:04 min | 26,900 Views
Umair Haque: Achieving Behavioral Innovation Umair Haque: Achieving Behavioral Innovation
00:22:08 min | 1,671 Views
Mary Roach: The Curious Coupling of Science and Sex Mary Roach: The Curious Coupling of Science and Sex
00:23:59 min | 39,383 Views
Verbal Judo: Diffusing Conflict Through Conversation Verbal Judo: Diffusing Conflict Through Conversation
01:31:12 min | 6,512 Views

Browse Programs by Tag

Arts Books Climate Change Computing Conflict Credit Crunch Defense Democratization Economic Policy Education Election 2008 Emerging Markets Energy Entertainment Entrepreneurship Environment Film Food Globalization Health & Wellness Healthcare History Internet Investing Law Medicine Music Muslim World Natural Sciences New Media Personal Technology Philanthropy Religion Social Issues Social Sciences Sustainability Terrorism The Bailout U.S. Foreign Policy White House 2009

Advertisement