Conferences Series Events
SPACE   |   EVOLUTION   |   PHYSICS   |   SOCIAL SCIENCES   |   NATURAL SCIENCES   |   DNA   |   PSYCHOLOGY   |   BIOTECH   |   MEDICINE   |   ANTHROPOLOGY   |   ASTRONOMY
INTERNET   |   NEW MEDIA   |   START-UPS   |   PERSONAL TECHNOLOGY   |   WIRELESS   |   COMPUTING   |   ENGINEERING   |   CEOS
RELIGION   |   GAMING   |   FILM   |   FASHION   |   SEX   |   PHILOSOPHY   |   EDUCATION   |   HISTORY   |   ARTS   |   MUSIC   |   TRAVEL   |   PHOTOGRAPHY
Watch Now

Dinesh D'Souza: What's So Great About Christianity

28
Likes
1
Dislikes
RATE
17,210 Views

  • Info
  • Bio
  • Chapters
  • Highlights
  • Transcript
  • Download
  • More
Please or register to post a comment.

psikeyhackr Avatar
psikeyhackr
Posts: 3
Posted: 08.24.11, 05:18 PM
That is an interesting comparison with Hitchens. A European talking about how bad Christianity is and an Indian saying that Hinduism was worse.

But what if God thinks they are both garbage? It is not like JC founded the Roman Catholic Church. Some people just decided to acquire and use his name.
Mohan0128 Avatar
Mohan0128
Posts: 2
Posted: 08.24.11, 05:07 PM
I compliment and agree with Mr. D'Souza on his views. But I feel that he is painfully incorrect in his understanding of the Hindu Caste System. While the sacred texts, the Vedas,spoke of society as being made up of 4 labor groups, the way the various communities divided it out based on tribal affiliation and economic conditions. Somehow, even Christians have placed themselves into this social structure and have benefited from India's affirmative action plans. There are far greater reasons for D'Souza's ancestors' choice of Christianity.
Dan Swargler Avatar
Dan Swargler
Posts: 1
Posted: 08.24.11, 12:58 PM
Yes, the caste system is a terrible thing and other religions had some appeal probably mostly to the lower castes. That and in some cases a sword held to the throat. I think Buddhism was the best deal there. Not so divisive.
Lary9 Avatar
Lary9
Posts: 49
Posted: 11.21.10, 07:37 AM
If by that you mean that he is not atrue believer, then I'm sure you are wrong.
Lary9 Avatar
Lary9
Posts: 49
Posted: 11.21.10, 02:18 AM
When D'Souza and Jones ask what evolutionary advantage does consciousness bring to human beings, they both mire the argument in the teleology of purpose-driven theology. Natural selection does not act directly on every modification or evolutionary outcome to a species. Modifications may be quite random and without any adaptive significance to nature's prime directive at all. They can just hitchhike along as it were, as a serendipitous new feature. Consciousness may be nothing more than that... a kind of lucky accident. Just because biological consciouness appears to be an engineered organic processor for centrally organizing human experience doesn't automatically make it some design off God's drafting table nor does it inherently weaken evolutionary dynamics either.

On another level, one might argue that human consciousness may have long ago exceeded its immediate brief and made homo sapiens uniquely successful at conceiving strategies to extend its DNA. No?
Mark Sullivan Avatar
Mark Sullivan
Posts: 160
Posted: 01.14.10, 11:30 PM
Once again, I am convinced that those who disrespectfully insult Mr. D'Souza and offer weak, deconstrustionist arguements against him did not listen to the discussion in its entirety. Do those of you who as-a-matter-of- factly dismiss his ideas or argue against things he did not say think you have the smarts to debate this gentleman? He is one of my favorite thinkers, not because I agree with everything he says, but because he lays out his aruguements clearly, respects those with whom he disagrees and is a fearless defender of religious and intellectual freedom.

I too enjoy debating atheists. They are frequently arrogant and condescending and lack intellectual horsepower. I simply do not understand the obsessive opposition to religion and what I see as irrational hatred for Christians.
Stephen Bala Avatar
Stephen Bala
Posts: 1
Posted: 09.03.09, 06:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bapyou
Dinesh D'Souza is a loathesome troll. He was the token darkey in the administration of Ronald Reagan, another loathesome troll. The key word here is loathesome. Thank you.

Re Bapyou's post:

Thank you for your intelligent and helpful criticism. Can't wait to hear your next pronouncement. I am a non-Christian but can still respect what Dinesh has to say. Right or wrong, at least he does not simply attacking others personally, but instead aims at intelligent argument.

From another Darky
anthonyc Avatar
anthonyc
Posts: 2
Posted: 08.25.09, 05:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rainerjosef
I agree - except your words on afterlife. Of course D'Souza is right in saying there is no proof there isn't an afterlife. This is not an argument against reason, it's the simple truth.
what's the truth, that there is no afterlife? please prove how your statement is fact.
anthonyc Avatar
anthonyc
Posts: 2
Posted: 08.25.09, 05:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by brushes9
Dinesh D'Souza is a bought-and-paid-for mouthpiece/lackey for the Republican-Evangelical-Taliban Party that is currently in the toilet
That was intelligent! Please don't hate on someone you can't understand...it just shows your stupidity.
Rainerjosef Avatar
Rainerjosef
Posts: 8
Posted: 04.16.09, 10:07 AM
I agree - except your words on afterlife. Of course D'Souza is right in saying there is no proof there isn't an afterlife. This is not an argument against reason, it's the simple truth.
Advertisement
NO ADS + DOWNLOADS + HQ VIEWING
UPGRADE TO FORA.tv PLUS
Advertisement