Richard Thompson Ford - Richard Ford is the George E. Osborne Professor of Law at Stanford Law School. An expert on civil rights and anti-discrimination law, his academic work focuses on the definition of political and legal boundaries as instruments of social regulation, and as cultural phenomena (with an emphasis on their racial and demographic implications).
He is also interested in humanities and the law and the intersection of critical theory and the law. Previously, Ford was a Reginald Lewis Teaching Fellow at Harvard Law School, a litigation associate with Morrison & Foerster, a housing policy consultant in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and commissioner of the San Francisco Housing Authority.
He publishes regularly on civil rights, constitutional law, race relations, and antidiscrimination law, and he is the author of The Race Card: How Bluffing about Race Makes Race Relations Worse and Racial Culture: A Critique.
Courtland Milloy - Courtland Milloy is a Metro Columnist at the Washington Post.
Courtland Milloy's column began in 1983 and deals primarily with issues that affect the lives of African Americans.
According to Stanford University law professor Richard Thompson Ford, America's conversation about race is often overwhelmed by distractions.
With Washington Post columnist Courtland Milloy, Ford discusses his newest book, The Race Card: How Bluffing About Bias Makes Race Relations Worse. Milloy moderates a lively Q and A session- The Aspen Institute
Very nice clip of an off-the-rails discussion. Ford does an excellent job of reconceptualizing "the race card" in a compelling way, and deflating a lot of the audience members' obvious conflation of the act of playing the race card and simply expressing prejudiced views.
Unfortunately, many members of the audience used the Q&A time to just speak about various issues involving racism or unsubtly imply that Ford wanted to muffle discussion of racism (except well, he's written a book about it).
Milloy was something of an unsettling distraction as the moderator. He didn't allow Ford much room to fully flesh out the premise of his book, instead dully challenging him to agree this or that, over and over. He also wrested the answer portion from Ford somewhat in responding to audience questions himself, unnecessarily clouding the discussion.