Did the notion that "Greed is Good" die out with the 1980s? In this thoughtful meditation, the first in the PEN Voices Lecture Series, writer Christopher Kremmer considers greed from all angles: social, historical, economic and cultural.
Bio
Christopher Kremmer
Christopher Kremmer is the author of four
books, numerous short stories and a
substantial body of journalism. Like few
writers over the past decade, he has explored
Asia's tumultuous journey from tradition
towards modernity.
His early short stories won several awards,
including the Patricia Rappolt Prize for young
writers in the prestigious Canberra Times
National Short Story Competition for 'The
Birthday Party'. Other short fiction, including
'Two Hundred Years from Home' and
'Footnotes to the Affair', was published in
Australian Short Stories.
After completing a Bachelor's degree in
Professional Writing at the University of
Canberra, Christopher worked in broadcast
and print media in Australia. During a period
spent in London he wrote comedy sketches
for the long-running Canal Cafe Theatre
company, and some of his work was
performed at the Edinburgh Arts Festival.
His work during a decade spent as a foreign
correspondent in Asia—first for the Australian
Broadcasting Corporation, and later for The
Sydney Morning Herald—earned him an
international profile as an intelligent and
sensitive observer of the region.
Today, Christopher is a research scholar with
the Writing and Society Group at the
University of Western Sydney, He teaches
literary non-fiction writing at workshops in
Australia and abroad.
The "market"- the sum total of production and exchange between individuals- does not need a bureaucracy to guide it.
If you don't want to do business with a private entity, you are not obligated to do so. If you perceive an injustice being created by an enterprise, you are free to keep your money away from them. Problem solved.
If you are unsatisfied with the way people are being treated by a government, you have no means of recourse- other than the symbolic act of voting.
What we have in the US today is an unethical kinship between those two groups, usually referred to as "corporatism". Corporations purchase influence over the existing regulatory agencies (which we have no control over), and use this influence to pursue their private interests at the expense of other individuals. Some examples of this relationship can be seen in the Federal Reserve Bank possessing a government-sanctioned monopoly over the issuance of currency, pharmaceutical companies installing handpicked chairmen to the FDA, agro-industrial firms doing the same with the USDA etc.
Please explain to me how greed is not self-limiting in the absence of government regulatory control.
I'm rather confused about the comments. There was nothing to do with ethanol in the clip or high food cost. As well, the comment which asserts without state control, greed is self-limiting is ridiculous. In what way? The only sense which could possibly made of that is to translate it as the market is capable of imposing regulations independently or, perhaps, to say that greed would be hurting its goal in the long term by being too greedy. Both of which have been shown to be wrong or, at least, in need reworking. Anyways, I wonder if the point was missed entirely. The speaker was simply talking about the nature of consumerism in areas of excess and its affects on a population's mentality. I don't claim to be an expert on the inner workings of economic structures, but the point was much simpler than that.
The greed question is about good vs. bad. Corporate greed only poses a threat to civil liberties and general well-being when it is compounded with over-reaching governmental powers over the market.
Without the mechanism of state control of trade and finance, greed is self-limiting.
WOW the level of stupid in this speech is astounding! Do to lack of time, or interest on my part, I will simply point out one flaw: The use of food for fuel has absolutely NOTHING to do with the free market! It is do to governments asinine ethanol requirement laws that are the major contributing factor to high food costs.