Conferences Series Events
SPACE   |   EVOLUTION   |   PHYSICS   |   SOCIAL SCIENCES   |   NATURAL SCIENCES   |   DNA   |   PSYCHOLOGY   |   BIOTECH   |   MEDICINE   |   ANTHROPOLOGY   |   ASTRONOMY
INTERNET   |   NEW MEDIA   |   START-UPS   |   PERSONAL TECHNOLOGY   |   WIRELESS   |   COMPUTING   |   ENGINEERING   |   CEOS
RELIGION   |   GAMING   |   FILM   |   FASHION   |   SEX   |   PHILOSOPHY   |   EDUCATION   |   HISTORY   |   ARTS   |   MUSIC   |   TRAVEL   |   PHOTOGRAPHY
Live Now
Watch Now

A Conversation with Lance Armstrong

2
Likes
0
Dislikes
RATE
18,418 Views

  • Info
  • Bio
  • Chapters
  • Highlights
  • Transcript
  • Download
  • More
Please or register to post a comment.

staroversky Avatar
staroversky
Posts: 5
Posted: 07.09.09, 02:22 PM
He speaks of the motivation away from - not to loose. Did not want to walk out as a looser.

Another point - just walk out of there.
staroversky Avatar
staroversky
Posts: 5
Posted: 07.09.09, 02:19 PM
The point about going out and training when it is a bad weather out there is often what differentiates winners from loosers in life.

Now, the question is - how specifically did he motivate himself to do training during bad weather ? What specifically was happening in his mind that got him going ?
Bashful320 Avatar
Bashful320
Posts: 27
Posted: 07.08.09, 02:38 PM
I agree with chris28, he was proven guilty but I definitely respect him for his fight against cancer and what he has done with the Livestrong bracelet campaign. He is in 2nd place right now in the Tour de France 2009 right now so hopefully he will win without "help".
chris28 Avatar
chris28
Posts: 1
Posted: 05.14.09, 04:49 AM
Even if I have respect Lance Amstrong for his fight against cancer, I don't share this opinion concerning its sport performance. He had already been prove guilty.

"6 urine samples taken from the cyclist during the prologue and five stages of the 1999 Tour de France, frozen and stored since at "Laboratoire national de dépistage du dopage de Châtenay-Malabry" (LNDD), had tested positive for EPO in recent retesting conducted as part of a research project into EPO testing methods. For years, it had been impossible to detect the drug, called erythropoietin, which builds endurance by boosting the production of oxygen carrying red blood cells."

If you watch again its performances like in the Ventoux mount the truth become clear. Even a proven cheater Marco Pantani couldn't follow Lance Amstrong.
chris1975 Avatar
chris1975
Posts: 7
Posted: 04.22.08, 03:16 AM
Lance is the greatest cyclist who ever lived. I think he is innocent until proven guilty. You know, sometimes, there are Michael Jordans in other sports, he is that good, (although his races were not that fun to watch because there was no competitve suspense, you know who would win!) And what adds to his greatness is that it would appear much of the competition was doped.
Advertisement
NO ADS + DOWNLOADS + HQ VIEWING
UPGRADE TO FORA.tv PLUS
Advertisement